Populist Attitudes, Conspiracy Beliefs and the Justification of Political Violence at the US 2020 Elections
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6343263 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sebastian Jungkunz (0000-0003-1040-8635, University of Bonn, autor de correspondencia), Robert A Fahey (0000-0002-6231-2881, Waseda Institute for Advanced Study, Waseda University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan), Airo Hino (0000-0001-5141-106X, Waseda University) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 73 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 592-611 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Political Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0032-3217 • E-ISSN: 1467-9248 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00323217241259229 |
| OpenAlex | W4401126396 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 63 |
The months around the US 2020 presidential election were characterized by polarization, populism, conspiracy theories, and violent acts, far exceeding usual out-party animosity in western democracies. Using an original two-wave panel survey fielded before the election in November 2020 (n = 3111) and after the inauguration in January 2021 (n = 3384), supported with data from the American National Election Study (ANES, n = 3080), we investigate the dynamics of political violence justification and its connection with populist attitudes and conspiracy beliefs. While we find that conspiracy beliefs are associated with higher justification of violence, the relationship with populist attitudes is mixed, and mostly depends on whether people believe in conspiracy theories or not—with populist attitudes being associated with greater political violence justification among those who believe conspiracy theories, while having no or even a negative correlation among those who do not. Finally, results from fixed-effects models provide some evidence for a temporal interpretation of the relationships, indicating that an increase in conspiracy beliefs is strongly and consistently associated with an increased willingness to justify violence
Interpretation (philosophy · Motivated reasoning · Panel survey · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Political violence · Politics · Populism · Presidential election · Presidential system · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Survey data collection · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology · Social Psychology
A comparison of individual needs and support of violence among radicals, extremists and fundamentalists in Western Europe
Psychometric study of the political violence support scale in a sample of Chilean university students
Rural Populism and Tolerance for Political Violence
Toxicity of political participation and news cynicism
Conspiracy or Public Service? Does Facebook’s Third-Party Fact-Checking Increase Conspiracy Beliefs Among Americans
QAnon’s Hashtag Hijacking Strategies and Engagement Dynamics Across Discursive Themes on Twitter
A Curse or a Blessing? The Associations of Political Knowledge With Partisan Hostility and Condonation of Political Violence
Fighting the Cabal from the Diet
Ggplot2
A Tale of Two Cultures
Fixed Effects Regression Models
Ggeffects
Current research overstates American support for political violence
Belief in conspiracy theories and intentions to engage in everyday crime
Panel Data Econometrics in R
Human Aggression
Anti-Politics in America
Resolving the Puzzle of Conspiracy Worldview and Political Activism
The Nature and Origins of Political Extremism In Germany and Beyond
Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories
Radical American Partisanship
Pylons ablaze
Passion and moral disengagement
Do conspiracy beliefs form a belief system? Examining the structure and organization of conspiracy beliefs
Conspiracy Theory Beliefs and Political Trust
Supporting political violence
The “Great Replacement” conspiracy
Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions
Measuring Populism across Nations
The Politics of Unreason
Psychological similarities and dissimilarities between left-wing and right-wing populists
To the fringe and back
Who Supports QAnon? A Case Study in Political Extremism
The Elite Is Up to Something
Economic Hardship Increases Justification of Political Violence
Sowing Dragon's Teeth
Does Populism Fuel Affective Polarization? An Individual-Level Panel Data Analysis
Populism and Support for Political Violence in the United States
An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales
The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization
Political Intolerance, Right and Left
"The Psychological Impact of Viewing the Film "JFK
Psychological Correlates of Populist Attitudes
Fueling the Fire
Christian Nationalism and Political Violence
Populist Attitudes among Teenagers
Who Supports Political Violence
Belief in conspiracy theories and attitudes toward political violence
Is Chávez Populist
American Politics in Two Dimensions
Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion
Surviving Elections
How Anti-Social Personality Traits and Anti-Establishment Views Promote Beliefs in Election Fraud, QAnon, and Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation
Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning
Group Entitlement, Anger and Participation in Intergroup Violence
Conspiracy theories as part of history
The Populist Zeitgeist
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Electoral Violence in Conflict-Ridden Societies
Public Support for Political Violence and Paramilitarism in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
Expressive Partisanship
When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 8 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |