Sanctioning Liberal Democracies
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6345127 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Avia Pasternak (0000-0003-0196-8876, Stanford University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2009 |
| Volumen | 57 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 54-74 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2009-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Political Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0032-3217 • E-ISSN: 1467-9248 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00728.x |
| OpenAlex | W2169458037 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 53 |
This article examines when economic sanctions should be imposed on liberal democracies that violate democratic norms. The argument is made from the social-liberal standpoint, which recognises the moral status of political communities. While social liberals rarely refer to the use of economic sanctions as a pressure tool, by examining why they restrict military intervention and economic aid to cases of massive human rights violations or acute humanitarian need, the article is able to show why they are likely to impose strong restrictions on the use of economic sanctions as well. After reconstructing the social-liberal case against economic sanctions, the article develops the argument that liberal democracies have reasons to support sanctions on other liberal democracies, even when they perpetrate injustices on a smaller scale. Liberal democracies share especially strong ideological, cultural and institutional bonds, and these peer group relations open them to mutual influence. When one liberal democracy commits serious injustices while still proclaiming allegiance to the democratic ethos, it can adversely affect the vitality of the democratic culture in those other liberal democracies with which it maintains close relations. Other liberal democracies therefore have the right and the obligation to condemn this behaviour, in order to preserve their allegiance to their values. The article defends the use of economic sanctions in light of some recent critiques, and concludes by providing an overall assessment of the factors which liberal democracies ought to take into account when they consider imposing economic sanctions on other liberal democracies
Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Economic sanctions · Ideology · Law and economics · Liberal democracy · Liberalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sanctions · Sociology · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · War, Ethics, and Justification
The Sanctions Decade
Liberal Nationalism
Thick and Thin
The Politics of Recognition
Just and Unjust Wars in Shakespeare
Strategy and International Governance Regimes
After Hegemony
National Responsibility and Global Justice
Cooperation among Democracies
Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy
Sovereign Virtue
The Problem of Global Justice
The Politics of Recognition
Democracy and Its Critics
In Search of Democratic Peace
Distributing Responsibilities
The Paradox of Political Representation
An Apology for Moral Shame
The Internal Legitimacy of Humanitarian Intervention
The Collective Enforcement of International Norms Through Economic Sanctions
A Peaceful, Silent, Deadly Remedy
More Ethical than Not
Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work
Republicanism
Pride, Shame and Guilt
Just and Unjust Wars
Sanctions
Smart Sanctions
Sovereignty, Rights and Justice
The Origins of Human Rights Regimes
When Do (Imposed) Economic Sanctions Work
On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions, With Examples from the Case of Rhodesia
How Long Do Economic Sanctions Last? Examining the Sanctioning Process through Duration
Fools Suffer Gladly
The microfoundations of economic sanctions
Explaining International Human Rights Regimes
Democratic Sanctions
The Economic Peace Between Democracies
Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism
The Alfonsín Administration and the Promotion of Democratic Values in the Southern Cone and the Andes
The Myth of Post-Cold War Chaos
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,27 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |