Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

International Relations and the Methodological Turn

Bibliographic Data

ID6345319
AuthorsRichard Little (0000-0002-4922-9629, Lancaster University, corresponding author)
Year1991
Volume39
Issue3
Pages463-478
Publication date1991-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3217 • E-ISSN: 1467-9248
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01623.x
OpenAlexW2094855142
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited8

Confusion has arisen in the debate between the advocates of classical and behavioural modes of analysis because epistemological and methodological issues are conflated in the debate. A distinction between logic-in-use and reconstructed logic disentangles these issues and demonstrates that the division between the classical and behavioural approaches cannot be sustained on methodological or epistemological grounds. History and social science cannot be distinguished in terms of either epistemology or methodology but only by the kind of research questions asked. This argument is reinforced by examining the methodological and epistemological posture adopted by Waltz. It is an illusion to imagine that theoretical debates in international relations will be resolved by methodological or epistemological fiat

Argument (complex analysis · Conflation · Confusion · Epistemology · Illusion · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Waltz · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Philosophy · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology

  • The English School

    Open Access•Tim Dunne•Inventing International Society•1998

  • Escape both the ‘Thucydides Trap’ and the ‘Churchill Trap’

    Open Access•Yuan Yang•The Chinese Journal of…•2018

  • The Triptych of Realism, Elitism, and Conservatism

    Open Access•Piki Ish-Shalom•International Studies Review•2006

  • Embrace IR Anxieties (or, Morgenthau's Approach to Power, and the Challenge of Combining the Three Domains of IR Theorizing)

    Open Access•Stefano Guzzini•International Studies Review•2020

  • International Relations

    Open Access•Duncan S A Bell, Duncan Bell•The British Journal of Politics…•2001

  • The logic of inquiry in post-Soviet studies

    Open Access•Frederic J Fleron•Communist and Post-Communist…•1996

  • The Growth of American Political Development

    Rogan Kersh•Perspectives on Politics•2005

  • Morgenthau as a Weberian Methodologist

    Open Access•Stephen Turner, George Mazur•European Journal of International…•2009

  • Neorealism and the English School

    Open Access•Richard Little•European Journal of International…•1995

  • Reflex to turn

    Open Access•Jaakko Heiskanen, Paul Beaumont•European Journal of International…•2024

  • Cities and states in Europe, 1000?1800

    Open Access•Charles Tilly•Theory and Society•1989

  • New Perspectives on Appeasement

    Open Access•James L Richardson•World Politics•1988

  • Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy

    Open Access•Kenneth A Oye•World Politics•1985

  • The Game Theory of International Politics

    Open Access•Duncan Snidal•World Politics•1985

  • The Study of International Politics

    Open Access•Kenneth W Thompson•The Review of Politics•1952

  • Diplomacy and domestic politics

    Open Access•Robert D Putnam•International Organization•1988

  • The Third Debate

    Yosef Lapid•International Studies Quarterly•1989

  • International organization

    Open Access•Friedrich Kratochwil, John Gerard Ruggie•International Organization•1986

Citations per year0.32
Citation span1995 - 2024 (30)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae