Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Public Preferences for Parliamentary Representation in the UK

An Overlooked Link

Bibliographic Data

ID6345844
AuthorsChristopher J Carman (0000-0003-3114-0666, University of Glasgow, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume54
Issue1
Pages103-122
Publication date2006-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3217 • E-ISSN: 1467-9248
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00568.x
OpenAlexW2033323495
LanguageEN
Citations received49
References cited20

Representation, both as a normative concept and a political process, has generated a rich literature across several national contexts. To develop our understanding of representational systems, scholars tend to assess the degree of policy congruence between parliamentarians and constituents as well as the role orientations adopted by elected parliamentarians and legislators. This paper contends that in order to have a complete understanding of representational systems, we must consider not only the representational roles adopted by parliamentarians, but also the publics’ preferences regarding parliamentary representation. Specifically, I posit that individuals have attitudes about the type and degree of relationship that they believe should exist between elected parliamentarians, parties and constituents. Using data from a 2003 survey of the British public, I test the related hypotheses that individuals have meaningful and predictable preferences for the representational relationship they share with their members of parliament (MPs) and that these representational preferences in turn influence how individuals evaluate MPs. Finding support for both hypotheses, I argue that developing an understanding of normative public preferences for political representation is an important and overlooked component in advancing models of public support of both elected officials and governing institutions

Congruence (geometry · Economics · Normative · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public opinion · Public relations · Representation (politics · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Agenda-Setting zwischen Parlament und Medien

    Open Access•Marko Kovic•Agenda-Setting zwischen Parlament…•2017

  • Styles of Political Representation

    Åsa Bengtsson, Hanna Wa et al.•Journal of Elections Public…•2010

  • Agenda-Setting zwischen Parlament und Medien

    Marko Kovic•Agenda-Setting zwischen Parlament…•2017

  • The Expectation Gap

    Open Access•David Talukder, Ruth Dassonneville•Representation•2026

  • Ce qu’être représenté·e veut dire. La relation de représentation du point de vue des citoyen·nes

    Lorenzo Barrault-Stella, J Talpin•Participations•2021

  • Delegate, Trustee, or Personal

    Open Access•Michael Barber, Ryan Davis et al.•American Politics Research•2026

  • Voter Preferences for Legislators' Effort Allocation

    Open Access•Nick C N Lin, Ellen Ying‐Shiou Kao•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2026

  • MPs between territories, assembly and party – Investigating parliamentary behaviour at the local level in France, Belgium and Germany

    Open Access•Nathan Brack, Olivier Costa et al.•French Politics•2016

  • Explaining MPs’ constituency service in multilevel systems

    Open Access•Nathan Brack, Jean-Benoit Pilet•French Politics•2016

  • Yes WE Can or Yes HE Can? Citizen Preferences Regarding Styles of Representation and Presidential Voting Behavior

    Open Access•David C Barker, Christopher J Carman•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2010

  • Countryside champions or urban allies? What rural and urban citizens want from elected representatives

    Open Access•Lindsey Mckay, Christopher Claassen et al.•Electoral Studies•2025

  • Mismatched Preferences for Responsiveness

    Open Access•Helene Helboe Pedersen•Scandinavian Political Studies•2021

  • Belgian affairs and constituent preferences for ‘good constituency members’

    Open Access•Audrey André, Sam Depauw et al.•Acta Politica•2013

  • Parliamentarians' Support for Direct and Deliberative Democracy in Europe

    Gherghina, Sergiu Gherghina et al.•Comparative Politics•2023

  • People-centred or Elite-centred Democrats? Legislators’ Process Preferences in the United States and Germany

    Open Access•Melody Crowder-Meyer, Leonard Häfner et al.•Government and Opposition•2026

  • Communicating the Rift

    Dominik Duell, Lea Kaftan et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Why Friends and Neighbors? Explaining the Electoral Appeal of Local Roots

    Rosie Campbell, Patrick Cowley et al.•The Journal of Politics•2019

  • The Representative Roles of MPs

    Open Access•Åsa Bengtsson, Hanna Wa•Scandinavian Political Studies•2011

  • Towards an Affective Turn in Theories of Representation

    Louise Knops•Representation•2023

  • An Authenticity Expectations Gap? A Comparison of Publics’ and Members of Parliament’s Views on Politicians Being True to Themselves

    Jean Kenny, John Kenny et al.•Polity•2025

  • The devil is in the detail

    Open Access•José Luis Fernández-Martínez, Joan Font Fàbregas et al.•Politics•2018

  • The Expert Cure? Exploring the Restorative Potential of Expertise for Public Satisfaction With Parties

    Open Access•Katharine Dommett, Luke Temple•Political Studies•2020

  • Where Democrats Disagree

    Open Access•Claudia Landwehr, Nils D Steiner•Political Studies•2017

  • Parliamentary Representation

    Open Access•Siim Trumm, Andrew Barclay•Political Studies•2023

  • Process Preferences and British Public Opinion

    Open Access•Nancy Allen, Nicholas Allen et al.•Political Studies•2015

  • Input from Whom? Public Reactions to Consultation Measures

    Open Access•Anthony Kevins•Political Studies•2022

  • The Quality of Representation and Satisfaction with Democracy

    Open Access•Audrey André, Sam Depauw•Political Behavior•2017

  • Citizens’ Preferences for Multidimensional Representation

    Open Access•Jack Blumenau, Fabio Wolkenstein et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • Constituency Juries

    Open Access•Bruno Leipold•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • Which personality fits personalized representation

    Open Access•Troels Bøggild, Rosie Campbell et al.•Party Politics•2021

  • Parliamentary Representation

    Open Access•Laura Sudulich, Siim Trumm et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2020

  • Beating Issue Agreement

    Åsa Von Schoultz, Hanna Wa et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2016

  • How Citizens Want Their Legislator to Vote

    Open Access•Ruth Dassonneville, André Blais et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2021

  • How do political decision-making processes affect the acceptability of decisions? Results from a survey experiment

    Open Access•Miho Nakatani•International Political Science…•2023

  • Voters’ preferences for party representation

    Open Access•Annika Werner•International Political Science…•2019

  • Listening to the people

    Karolin Soontjens, Stefaan Walgrave•Journal of Legislative Studies•2023

  • The value of political parties to representative democracy

    Open Access•Ann-Kristin Kölln•European Political Science Review•2015

  • Voters reward hard-working MPs

    Open Access•Abel François, Julien Navarro•European Political Science Review•2019

  • How rational are voters when expecting government parties to fulfil pledges? A cross‐national survey experiment

    Open Access•Reinhard Heinisch, Annika Werner•European Journal of Political…•2023

  • Patterns of democracy and democratic satisfaction

    Open Access•Zsófia Papp, Julien Navarro et al.•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • House or home? Constituent preferences over legislator effort allocation

    Open Access•Nick Vivyan, Markus Wagner•European Journal of Political…•2016

  • As you wish? Public preferences for models of representation and MPs’ role orientations

    Open Access•Philippe Mongrain, Nino Junius et al.•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Ideological beasts or effective organizations? Do voters’ views of democracy affect their expectations of political parties

    Open Access•Annika Werner, Reinhard Heinisch•Democratization•2024

  • I the People? Self-Interest and Demand for Government Responsiveness

    Open Access•Jan Rosset, Nathalie Giger et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2017

  • Trustees, Delegates, and Responsiveness in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler•Comparative Political Studies•2017

  • Multidimensional Representation

    Open Access•Fabio Wolkenstein, Christopher Wratil•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • Legislator Dissent as a Valence Signal

    Open Access•Rosie Campbell, Patrick Cowley et al.•British Journal of Political…•2019

  • What voters want from their parties

    Open Access•Annika Werner•Electoral Studies•2019

  • The effect of congruence in policy priorities on electoral participation

    Open Access•Stefanie Reher•Electoral Studies•2014

  • What's fair?

    Jennifer L Hochschild•What's fair?•1981

  • Westminster's world

    Donald Searing•Westminster's world•1994

  • Congressmen's Voting Decisions

    John W Kingdon, John Kingdon•Congressmen's voting decisions•1989

  • Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies

    Russell J Dalton•Critical citizens•1999

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Endogeneity, Exogeneity, Time, and Space in Political Representation

    Open Access•James H Kuklinski, Gary M Segura et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1995

  • When sheep bark

    Patrick Cowley, Mark Stuart•Journal of Elections Public…•2004

  • A Simple Theory of the Survey Response

    John Zaller, Stanley Feldman•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Assessing Legislator-Constituency Policy Agreement

    Open Access•Robert Weissberg•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1979

  • The House Is Not a Home

    Open Access•Bruce E Cain, John Ferejohn et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1979

  • Political Representation in Spain

    Mónica Méndez-Lago, Álvaro Martínez•Journal of Legislative Studies•2002

  • Partisan Representation and the Failure of Realignment in the 1980s

    Patricia A Hurley•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • Dyadic Representation Reappraised

    Kim Quaile Hill, Kim Hill et al.•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • The Public as Thermostat

    Christopher Wlezien•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Valerie Heitshusen, Garry Young et al.•American Journal of Political…•2005

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress

    Open Access•Robert Weissberg•American Political Science Review•1978

  • The Role of the Representative

    Open Access•Heinz Eulau, John C Wahlke et al.•American Political Science Review•1959

Unique citing works49
Citations per year3,06
Citation span2010 - 2026 (17)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 49

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae