Public Preferences for Parliamentary Representation in the UK
An Overlooked Link
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6345844 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher J Carman (0000-0003-3114-0666, University of Glasgow, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 103-122 |
| Publication date | 2006-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3217 • E-ISSN: 1467-9248 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00568.x |
| OpenAlex | W2033323495 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 49 |
| References cited | 20 |
Representation, both as a normative concept and a political process, has generated a rich literature across several national contexts. To develop our understanding of representational systems, scholars tend to assess the degree of policy congruence between parliamentarians and constituents as well as the role orientations adopted by elected parliamentarians and legislators. This paper contends that in order to have a complete understanding of representational systems, we must consider not only the representational roles adopted by parliamentarians, but also the publics’ preferences regarding parliamentary representation. Specifically, I posit that individuals have attitudes about the type and degree of relationship that they believe should exist between elected parliamentarians, parties and constituents. Using data from a 2003 survey of the British public, I test the related hypotheses that individuals have meaningful and predictable preferences for the representational relationship they share with their members of parliament (MPs) and that these representational preferences in turn influence how individuals evaluate MPs. Finding support for both hypotheses, I argue that developing an understanding of normative public preferences for political representation is an important and overlooked component in advancing models of public support of both elected officials and governing institutions
Congruence (geometry · Economics · Normative · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public opinion · Public relations · Representation (politics · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology
Agenda-Setting zwischen Parlament und Medien
Styles of Political Representation
Agenda-Setting zwischen Parlament und Medien
The Expectation Gap
Ce qu’être représenté·e veut dire. La relation de représentation du point de vue des citoyen·nes
Delegate, Trustee, or Personal
Voter Preferences for Legislators' Effort Allocation
MPs between territories, assembly and party – Investigating parliamentary behaviour at the local level in France, Belgium and Germany
Explaining MPs’ constituency service in multilevel systems
Yes WE Can or Yes HE Can? Citizen Preferences Regarding Styles of Representation and Presidential Voting Behavior
Countryside champions or urban allies? What rural and urban citizens want from elected representatives
Mismatched Preferences for Responsiveness
Belgian affairs and constituent preferences for ‘good constituency members’
Parliamentarians' Support for Direct and Deliberative Democracy in Europe
People-centred or Elite-centred Democrats? Legislators’ Process Preferences in the United States and Germany
Communicating the Rift
Why Friends and Neighbors? Explaining the Electoral Appeal of Local Roots
The Representative Roles of MPs
Towards an Affective Turn in Theories of Representation
An Authenticity Expectations Gap? A Comparison of Publics’ and Members of Parliament’s Views on Politicians Being True to Themselves
The devil is in the detail
The Expert Cure? Exploring the Restorative Potential of Expertise for Public Satisfaction With Parties
Where Democrats Disagree
Parliamentary Representation
Process Preferences and British Public Opinion
Input from Whom? Public Reactions to Consultation Measures
The Quality of Representation and Satisfaction with Democracy
Citizens’ Preferences for Multidimensional Representation
Constituency Juries
Which personality fits personalized representation
Parliamentary Representation
Beating Issue Agreement
How Citizens Want Their Legislator to Vote
How do political decision-making processes affect the acceptability of decisions? Results from a survey experiment
Voters’ preferences for party representation
Listening to the people
The value of political parties to representative democracy
Voters reward hard-working MPs
How rational are voters when expecting government parties to fulfil pledges? A cross‐national survey experiment
Patterns of democracy and democratic satisfaction
House or home? Constituent preferences over legislator effort allocation
As you wish? Public preferences for models of representation and MPs’ role orientations
Ideological beasts or effective organizations? Do voters’ views of democracy affect their expectations of political parties
I the People? Self-Interest and Demand for Government Responsiveness
Trustees, Delegates, and Responsiveness in Comparative Perspective
Multidimensional Representation
Legislator Dissent as a Valence Signal
What voters want from their parties
The effect of congruence in policy priorities on electoral participation
What's fair?
Westminster's world
Congressmen's Voting Decisions
Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies
An economic theory of democracy
Endogeneity, Exogeneity, Time, and Space in Political Representation
When sheep bark
A Simple Theory of the Survey Response
Assessing Legislator-Constituency Policy Agreement
The House Is Not a Home
Political Representation in Spain
Partisan Representation and the Failure of Realignment in the 1980s
Dyadic Representation Reappraised
The Public as Thermostat
Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom
Constituency Influence in Congress
Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress
The Role of the Representative
| Unique citing works | 49 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,06 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2026 (17) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 49 |