Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Politics of Justification

Bibliographic Data

ID6350255
AuthorsStephen Macedo (0000-0003-3083-2636, Harvard University, corresponding author)
Year1990
Volume18
Issue2
Pages280-304
Publication date1990-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-5917 • E-ISSN: 1552-7476
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0090591790018002006
OpenAlexW2031905361
LanguageEN
Citations received24
References cited2

THE PRACTICE OF POLITICAL JUSTIFICATION is not just for philosophers, and it does not simply lie behind (as we may hope) our political arrangements. Commitments to reason giving and reason demanding inform some of our most valuable political practices. Judicial review, most obviously, helps ensure legislative and executive acts are reasonable in constitutional terms: In court it is not the fact of power but the display of reasons and evidence counts. Not only the courts, but also Congress and the executive branch sometimes (and quite properly) conscientiously justify their actions in constitutional terms. Constitution aside, much takes place in and around legislatures, elections, and other political fora can be understood as efforts to justify particular policies and programs.1 Liberals demand, as Jeremy Waldron puts it, that the social order should in principle be capable of explaining itself at the tribunal of each person's understanding.2 Liberal, democratic politics is not only about individual rights and limited govemment, it is also about justification, but not about any kind of justification at all. Liberal political justification, even in its ideal form, should be understood politically this article considers why and how. Liberal contractualists typically seek justifications are widely acceptable to reasonable people with a broad range of moral, philosophical, and religious commitments.3 The aim is reasonable agreement: to be both reasonable and agreeable in a widely pluralistic society.4 The appropriate means is a process of reasoning is publicly accessible, but genuinely justificatory

Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Liberalism and Mysticism

    Christopher J Eberle•Journal of Law and Religion•1996

  • Deliberative Politics in Action

    Open Access•Jürg Steiner, André Bächtiger et al.•Deliberative Politics in Action•2005

  • Still There But For How Long? The Counter-Intuitiveness of the Universal Welfare Model and the Development of the Universal Welfare State in Denmark

    Christoffer Green-Pedersen•Revue française des affaires…•2003

  • Rawls, Political Liberalism and Reasonable Faith

    Open Access•Paul Weithman•Rawls, Political Liberalism and…•2016

  • Is Social Policy Retrenchment Unpopular? How Welfare Reforms Affect Government Popularity

    Nathalie Giger•European Sociological Review•2012

  • Les droits religieux sont-ils compatibles avec le pluralisme démocratique

    Open Access•Roberto Frega•Quel âge post-séculier•2015

  • Reflexive Demokratie

    Open Access•Rainer Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer Schmalz‐Bruns•Reflexive Demokratie•1995

  • Consenting to Geoengineering

    Open Access•Pak‐Hang Wong, Pak-Hang Wong•Philosophy & Technology•2016

  • Responsibility and the hidden politics of directionality

    Open Access•Andy Stirling•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2024

  • Justification, Pluralism and Pragmatism

    Open Access•Matt Sleat•European Journal of Pragmatism…•2013

  • Bringing political identity into discursive and ideational analysis

    Open Access•Fiona Ro•British Politics•2012

  • Experts versus politicians

    Open Access•Neda Delfani•Comparative European Politics•2012

  • Do voters punish the government for welfare state retrenchment? A comparative study of electoral costs associated with social policy

    Open Access•Nathalie Giger•Comparative European Politics•2010

  • Legitimacy, Democracy and Public Justification

    Open Access•Enzo Rossi•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2013

  • Public Reason through the Mirror of the One. Claude Lefort vs. Rawls

    Pauline Colonna d’Istria•Revue du MAUSS•2011

  • Can Liberalism Lose the Enlightenment

    Jeremy Fortier•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Taking reasonable pluralism seriously

    Open Access•Fabian Freyenhagen•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2011

  • A Human Right to Deliberative Justification

    Minh Ly Duc, Minh Ly•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Political Philosophy and Empowering Citizens

    Open Access•Avner De-Shalit, Avner De‐shalit•Political Studies•2004

  • Comparing Government Agendas

    Open Access•Peter Bjerre Mortensen, Christoffer Green-Pedersen et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2011

  • Liberty and Community

    Robert B Thigpen, Lyle Downing•Perspectives on Political Science•1991

  • Public political thought

    Open Access•Uriel Abulof•British Journal of Sociology•2016

  • Citizenship revocation

    Janie Pélabay, Réjane Sénac•Citizenship Studies•2019

  • Rawls's "Political" Philosophy and American Democracy

    Open Access•George Klosko•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Reconsidering Dworkin's Case for Judicial Activism

    Stanley C Brubaker•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism

    Jeremy Waldron•The Philosophical Quarterly•1987

Unique citing works24
Citations per year0,69
Citation span1991 - 2024 (34)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 23

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae