Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Constitutional Indifferentism and Republican Freedom

Bibliographic Data

ID6350598
AuthorsLars Vinx (0000-0003-0973-9613, Bilkent University, Ankara, TURKEY,, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume38
Issue6
Pages809-837
Publication date2010-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-5917 • E-ISSN: 1552-7476
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0090591710378585
OpenAlexW2110664749
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited10

Neo-republicans claim that Hobbes’s constitutional indifferentism (the view that we have no profound reason to prefer one constitutional form over another) is driven exclusively by a reductive understanding of liberty as non-interference. This essay argues that constitutional indifferentism is grounded in an analysis of the institutional presuppositions of well-functioning government that does not depend on a conception of liberty as mere non-interference. Hence, indifferentism cannot be refuted simply by pointing out that non-domination is a distinctive ideal of freedom. This result does not suffice to defend the strong version of indifferentism put forward by Hobbes. But it does point to an important limitation of neo-republican constitutional theory: Neo-republicanism will amount to a distinctive paradigm of constitutional thought only if it is understood in a way that conflicts with Hobbes’s understanding of the institutional presuppositions of well-functioning government. It is doubtful that we have good reason to embrace neo-republicanism, so understood

Constitutional law · Constitutional theory · Epistemology · Government (linguistics · Ideal (ethics · Law and economics · Negative liberty · Political science · Politics · Presupposition · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Towards Confucian Republicanism

    Elton Chan•Towards Confucian Republicanism•2025

  • Huang Zongxi as a Republican

    Open Access•Elton Chan•Dao•2018

  • Personality, authority, and self-esteem in Hobbes’s Leviathan

    Open Access•Lars Vinx•Intellectual History Review•2022

  • Hobbes

    Open Access•Thomas Hobbes, Michael Silverthorne et al.•Hobbes : Leviathan•1996

  • The Core of the Case against Judicial Review

    Jeremy Waldron•The Yale Law Journal•2006

  • Absolutism and royalism

    Open Access•Johann P Sommerville•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • How Hobbes Met the ‘Hobbes Challenge’

    Open Access•David Dyzenhaus•Modern Law Review•2009

  • The Indeterminacy of Republican Policy

    Open Access•Christopher Mcmahon, Christopher J McMahon•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2005

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,38
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae