Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Truth and Loyalty

Bibliographic Data

ID6351035
AuthorsMatt Sleat (0000-0003-2518-6940, University of Sheffield, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume52
Issue4
Pages581-604
Publication date2024-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-5917 • E-ISSN: 1552-7476
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00905917231204892
OpenAlexW4388493011
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited42

This paper explores the relationship between truth and loyalty as it pertains to epistemic issues within contemporary Western politics. One now familiar concern is how an increasing number of people determine their beliefs according to what demonstrating loyalty to their group requires instead of the facts of an independent and objective reality, as a proper concern for truthfulness demands. Whereas “they” base their beliefs on what is required to demonstrate loyalty to their group, “our” beliefs are justified by facts and evidence. Such contrasts pit loyalty and truth as necessarily antagonistic. This paper gives us further reason for thinking that putting loyalty against truthfulness at some very general or conceptual level is deeply misguided. More significantly, it seeks to show that the more helpful contrast to make is between those who are loyal to identities that value truthfulness in such a way that there are no other parts of that identity which are not revisable if they come into conflict with truth, and those who are loyal to identities that subordinate truth to other ends or goals. Acknowledging this allows us to better appreciate various aspects of how the relationship between truth and loyalty is playing out in contemporary politics. Chief among these is how our own commitment to truthfulness is itself embedded in a particular identity, an identity that we not only often fail to acknowledge as such but which necessitates us thinking harder about the ways in which it might itself sustain the dynamics of conflict and contestation, antagonizing those who do not share it and driving them farther away from the truthfulness we extol

Aesthetics · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept · Identity (music · Loyalty · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Electoral Hope

    Open Access•Matthew Barnfield•Political Studies•2025

  • How Partisanship Can Moderate the Influence of Communicated Information on the Beliefs of Agents Aiming to Form True Beliefs

    Open Access•Maarten Van Doorn•Social Epistemology•2024

  • Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care?

    Neil Gross•Why Are Professors Liberal and…•2013

  • The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 1

    Open Access•Dan M Kahan•Emerging Trends in the Social and…•2016

  • Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory

    Open Access•Hugo Mercier, Dan Sperber•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2011

  • Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism

    Richard Rorty•The Journal of Philosophy•1983

  • In Defence of Non-Ideal Political Deference

    Open Access•Matthias Brinkmann•EPISTÉMÈ•2022

  • The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology

    Michael Hannon, Jeroen De Ridder•Routledge Handbook of Political…•2021

  • “Don’t confuse me with facts”—how right wing populism affects trust in agencies advocating anthropogenic climate change as a reality

    Open Access•Olve Krange, Bjørn P Kaltenborn et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • Self‐deception about truthfulness

    Open Access•Matt Sleat•European Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • The Psychology of Self‐defense

    David K Sherman, Geoffrey L Cohen•Advances in Experimental Social…•2006

  • “Hot” Political Cognition

    John T Jost, Erin P Hennes et al.•Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition•2013

  • Against postmodernism

    Alex Callinicos•Choice Reviews Online•1990

  • Love the Science, Hate the Scientists

    Open Access•Marcus Mann, Cyrus Schleifer•Social Forces•2020

  • A note on the perverse effects of actively open-minded thinking on climate-change polarization

    Open Access•Dan M Kahan, Jonathan C Corbin•Research & Politics•2016

  • Making Identities Safe for Democracy

    Open Access•Derrick Darby, Eduardo J Martinez•Journal of Political Philosophy•2021

  • Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another's opinions

    Open Access•Jeremy A Frimer, Linda J Skitka et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2017

  • Anti-Intellectualism, Populism, and Motivated Resistance to Expert Consensus

    Open Access•Eric Merkley•Public Opinion Quarterly•2020

  • The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues

    Open Access•Milton Lodge, Charles S Taber•Political Psychology•2005

  • Democratic Group Cognition

    Open Access•Maxime Lepoutre•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2020

  • Human Life Is Group Life

    Sherrie Chamber, Simone Chamber•Critical Review•2018

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Party Over Policy

    Geoffrey L Cohen•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the United States

    Open Access•Matthew Motta•American Politics Research•2018

  • The Polarizing Effect of the March for Science on Attitudes toward Scientists

    Open Access•Matthew Motta•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

  • Cultural cognition of scientific consensus

    Dan M Kahan, Hank C Jenkins‐smith et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism

    Jeremy Waldron•The Philosophical Quarterly•1987

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Loyalty and Virtues

    R E Ewin•The Philosophical Quarterly•1992

  • Feeling validated versus being correct

    William Hart, Dolores Albarracin et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2009

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae