Diderot’s Letter on the Blind as Disability Political Theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6352247 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nancy J Hirschmann (0000-0002-6189-4509, Department of Political Science, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 84-108 |
| Publication date | 2020-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-5917 • E-ISSN: 1552-7476 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0090591719843063 |
| OpenAlex | W2943104892 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
This essay considers Denis Diderot’s Letter on the Blind for the Use of Those Who Can See as a work that can contribute to a disability political theory. By recounting the experiences of visually impaired persons in their own words, Diderot opens up possibilities for a disability politics of self-representation, maintaining that sighted persons should listen to blind persons’ accounts of their own experience rather than relying on their own imaginings and assumptions. By using blind experiences to challenge a philosophical problem that intrigued philosophers of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries amid often-unsuccessful efforts to “cure” blindness through cataract surgeries, Diderot develops a powerful critique of the empiricist stress on vision as the primary source of perception and provides a remarkably forward-looking critique of disablist attitudes toward the blind. Through this philosophical discourse, he engages a political argument about the way knowledge is gathered, evaluated, and interpreted through relationships of power
Aesthetics · Argument (complex analysis · Blindness · Disability studies · Empiricism · Epistemology · Perception · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Representation (politics · Sociology · French Literature and Criticism · Gender Studies · Historical and Literary Analyses · Historical and Literary Studies · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |