New Labour in Perspective
A Comment on Rubinstein
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6352945 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Philip Larkin (0000-0001-8424-3920, corresponding author), Phil Larkin |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 51-55 |
| Publication date | 2001-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3268 • E-ISSN: 1467-9256 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9256.00135 |
| OpenAlex | W2041217922 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 5 |
In a recent issue of this journal, David Rubinstein (2000) questioned Stephen Driver and Luke Martell's characterisation of New Labour as a fundamental break with the past. Rubinstein notes important continuities between ‘Old’ Labour governments and the current Blair government, and correctly challenges Driver and Martell's simple ‘old’/‘new’ portrayal. However, he underestimates the extent to which contextual changes impact upon a left-of-centre government's ability to achieve its aims
Economics · Epistemology · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Neoclassical economics · Perspective (graphical · Positive economics · Simple (philosophy · Sociology · Computer Science · Philosophy · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Scottish History and National Identity · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Artificial Intelligence
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 2003 - 2007 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |