Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Willing Executors of Hitler's Will? The Goldhagen Controversy, Political Analysis and the Holocaust

Bibliographic Data

ID6353604
AuthorsCameron Hay (0000-0001-6327-6547, corresponding author), Colin Hay
Year2000
Volume20
Issue3
Pages119-128
Publication date2000-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3268 • E-ISSN: 1467-9256
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/1467-9256.00121
OpenAlexW2039005705
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited6

Daniel Goldhagen's Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (1996) has won its author a succession of accolades, from the American Political Science Association's prestigious Gabriel A. Almond Prize in comparative politics in 1994 to the even more prestigious Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik's Democracy Prize (awarded last in 1990). It has also occasioned an unprecedented and intense controversy on both sides of the Atlantic. In this article I consider the attribution of responsibility for the Holocaust in the Goldhagen thesis and the controversy this has spawned. I argue that despite Goldhagen's efforts to restore the conscious human subject to the perpetration of the Holocaust, the logic of his thesis in fact serves largely to absolve German subjects of culpability for an act of barbarism he regards as at least latent in an ‘exceptional’ and ‘eliminationist’ anti-Semitism that predates the rise of fascism. I take issue with Goldhagen's identification of Hitler's willing executioners as ‘Germans’, arguing that if human subjects are to be restored to the analysis of the Holocaust (as, indeed, they should be), it is imperative that we acknowledge the distinctly unexceptional character of ‘Ordinary Germans’ and, consequently re-examine our own culpability in this most modern of atrocities

Criminology · Culpability · German · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Subject (documents · The Holocaust · Communism, Protests, Social Movements · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Psychology

  • Screening Women’s Complicity in the Holocaust

    Adam Brown•Holocaust Studies•2011

  • Do We Have to Choose Between Different Concepts of Social Structure? A Comparative Analysis of Approaches and Ideas From Nigel Pleasants, Douglas V. Porpora, and David Easton

    Open Access•Mikael Rundqvist•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2025

  • Hitler's willing executioners

    Daniel Jonah Goldhagen•Hitler's willing executioners•1996

  • A Nation on Trial

    Stanley Hoffmann, Norman G Finkelstein et al.•Foreign Affairs•1998

  • Revising the Holocaust

    Open Access•Ruth Bettina Birn•The Historical Journal•1997

  • Divided by a Common Language

    Open Access•Cameron Hay, Colin Hay•Politics•1997

  • The Goldhagen Controversy

    Fritz Stern•Foreign Affairs•1996

  • Germans vs. the Critics

    Daniel Jonah Goldhagen•Foreign Affairs•1997

Citations per year0.13
Citation span2011 - 2025 (15)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae