Unravelling the Putin Myth
Strong or Weak Caesar
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6353669 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Owen Worth (0000-0002-2407-3947) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 53-61 |
| Publication date | 2009-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3268 • E-ISSN: 1467-9256 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2008.01338.x |
| OpenAlex | W1984685224 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 14 |
Having left office, the legacy of Putin will be examined in a multitude of different ways and from a variety of contrasting positions. The approach suggested here is that Putin can be seen as a leader who embarked upon a series of Caesarist strategies in order to create a stable and distinct sociological base for the post-communist Russian state. Its success can be assessed by whether Putin managed to appear as a ‘strong prince’ and/or succeeded in harmonising Russian civil and political society towards a hegemonic state, or whether he ultimately failed to solve the problems of instability that were left by his predecessor
Communism · Economics · Hegemony · Multitude · Mythology · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Variety (cybernetics · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Russia and Soviet political economy
Virtual politics
Russia and the Idea of Europe
The Janus-like Character of Counter-hegemony
Trust in public institutions in Russia
Vladimir the great, Grand Prince of Muscovy
Putin's Legacy and Russia's Identity
Putin's struggle for federalism
Putin's Leadership
Russia under western eyes
Hegemony, International Political Economy and Post-Communist Russia
Communist Legacies, Postcommunist Transformations, and the Fate of Organized Labor in Russia and China
Modern Tsars and Princes
The Russian economic puzzle
The Prince
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2020 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |