Resurgent Academic Interest in the Council on Foreign Relations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6353776 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Inderjeet Parmar (0000-0001-8688-9020) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-39 |
| Publication date | 2001-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3268 • E-ISSN: 1467-9256 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9256.00132 |
| OpenAlex | W2028681011 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 19 |
This article is based around a review of five books on the Council on Foreign Relations, an elite American foreign affairs think-tank, written during the 1990s. It aims to consider some of the reasons for this upsurge in academic interest in the CFR, the character of the books themselves, and how they approach and analyse the organisation. In so doing, the article takes a critical stance to the literature and suggests what a more adequate theoretical approach to the CFR might look like
Character (mathematics · Elite · Foreign policy · Foreign relations · International relations · Political science · Politics · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Thinking The Unthinkable
The Issue of State Power
Bringing the State Back In
A Cross of Iron
Corporatism
Mobilizing America for An Internationalist Foreign Policy”
Drift or Mastery? A Corporatist Synthesis for American Diplomatic History
The limits of influence
The Council on Foreign Relations and American foreign policy in the early Cold War
Imperial Brain Trust
The Discovery and Study of a “Corporate Liberalism”
Foreign Affairs at 70
The Purposes of American Power
Back to the Womb? Isolationism's Renewed Threat
The Idea Brokers
Grass-Roots Policymaking
States and Social Revolutions
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,1 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2020 (16) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |