Introduction
(Re)integrating Feminist Security Studies and Global Political Economy: Continuing the Conversation through Empirical Perspectives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6355016 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maria Martin De Almagro (0000-0002-3760-0638, Université de Montréal), Caitlin Ryan (0000-0003-3740-540X, University of Groningen) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politics & Gender (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1743-923X • E-ISSN: 1743-9248 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1743923x2000032x |
| OpenAlex | W3047319872 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 14 |
Attempts to integrate feminist security studies (FSS) and feminist global political economy (GPE) were first meticulously studied in the Critical Perspectives sections of the June 2015 and December 2017 issues of this journal. Although the debate has gained presence in workshops, at international conferences, and even on dedicated websites, the diverse contributions have remained rather theoretical (e.g., Bergeron, Cohn, and Duncanson 2017; Hudson 2015). The aim of these Critical Perspectives essays is to take the integration of FSS and GPE one step further by presenting empirically grounded contributions that help us contextualize the existing theoretical debates. By focusing on postwar contexts, the pieces here take seriously the material conditions of women's empowerment from a perspective attuned to the gendered and racialized logics structuring social orders in postwar states. We believe that these are the spaces where war economies and peace economies meet and where (gendered) structural transformation of societies is possible. Like the two previous collections, we do not understand FSS and GPE as additive (Chisholm and Stachowitsch 2017). Rather, we understand them as traditions that share a common goal, namely, to undermine the racialized neoliberalism and patriarchal capitalism underpinning international intervention and postwar reconstruction projects
Capitalism · Conversation · Economics · Economy · Empowerment · Feminism · Neoliberalism (international relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Structuring · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Law
Gender in Peacebuilding
Estudios feministas de seguridad y ética del cuidado
Simultaneous Elections and the Rise of Female Representation in Indonesia
Central European subalterns speak security (too)
Logics of Gender, Peace, and Security
Peace at the Margins? Peacebuilding and Patriarchal World Ordering in Sierra Leone
Steel mills, markets and war
Gender and International Relations
Margins, silences and bottom rungs
The Political Economy of Violence against Women
Bananas, Beaches and Bases
Feminist Global Political Economies of the Everyday
Sex, Security and Superhero(in)es
(Re)framing the Relationship between Discourse and Materiality in Feminist Security Studies and Feminist IPE
From the Colonial to Feminist IR
Introduction
Rebuilding Bridges
(Re)integrating Feminist Security Studies and Feminist Global Political Economy
The Everyday Gendered Political Economy of Violence
Subverting economic empowerment
Gender, UN Peacebuilding, and the Politics of Space
Women, economy, war
| Citations per year | 1.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |