State, Status, and the American Family
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6355485 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anthony Gash (0000-0002-9498-2505), Alison Gash, Priscilla Yamin (0000-0002-9964-3430) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 146-164 |
| Publication date | 2016-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Polity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3497 • E-ISSN: 1744-1684 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1057/pol.2016.5 |
| OpenAlex | W2389766225 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 8 |
Imagine a world where households have to apply to be considered a family by the state. They would need to document how their domestic grouping fulfills the requirements of “family” through bank statements, passports, Social Security numbers, and perhaps even recommendations from those in their community attesting to the strength and quality of their relationships or their health and fitness. In reality, this scenario is not as far-fetched as one might think. We contend that family is a status bestowed by the state. The state invokes, imposes, and relies on the family as an instrument of policy implementation and enforcement and as way of organizing and managing a productive society. In disseminating the benefits and protections that hinge on family, the state holds significant autonomy in determining whether certain households will be perceived and treated as families in the eyes of the state. Through the lens of policy debates regarding LGBTQ-headed households, single-mother-headed households, and group homes, we argue the following: concepts of family operate as an arm of the state; as more policies hinge on familyhood, more households seek that determination from the state; and state actors are at once exclusive and inconsistent in granting this status. In all, this suggests that rather than operating only as a matter of individual choice – a way of naming our private relationships – family should also be understood as a state-appointed and -anointed status
Autonomy · Business · Enforcement · Family life · Law and economics · Political science · Public relations · Socioeconomics · Sociology · State (computer science · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2023 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |