Gerrard Winstanley
The Radicalism of the Good Son
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6355642 |
|---|---|
| Authors | George Shulman (0000-0002-9571-4908, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 473-497 |
| Publication date | 1986-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Polity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3497 • E-ISSN: 1744-1684 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3234771 |
| OpenAlex | W2318841056 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
At the same time that Hobbes published Leviathan, Gerrard Winstanley wrote and worked to oppose market institutions and possessive individualism. He has not had much of an audience, and this neglect of him, Professor Shulman thinks, would seem to have been undeserved. He submits that Winstanley's argument takes account of both class interests and unconscious motives while avoiding reductionism about meaning, action, and politics. Based on an understanding of reverence, it offers a useful perspective on some of the enduring issues in radical thought and action
Action (physics · Argument (complex analysis · Class action · Epistemology · Individualism · Meaning (existential · Political radicalism · Political science · Politics · Possessive · Reverence · Sociology · Unconscious mind · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |