The Struggle to Reform Intelligence after 9/11
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6358405 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard J Harknett (0009-0004-2203-2633, University of Cincinnati), James A Stever (University of Cincinnati) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 700-706 |
| Publication date | 2011-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Administration Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02409.x |
| OpenAlex | W2059190643 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 2 |
Two years after the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Congress passed the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act. This act aspired to replace a sprawling agency‐oriented intelligence apparatus with an integrated, networked intelligence community. The act envisioned a director of national intelligence who would accomplish sweeping structural reforms, while at the same time maintaining and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of intelligence operations. This vision has not materialized. The director of national intelligence does not have the power to implement structural reforms. Schisms between the legislature and the executive also hamper reforms
Agency (philosophy · Homeland security · Intelligence analysis · Intelligence cycle · Legislature · Military intelligence · National security · Political science · Power (physics · Sociology · Terrorism · United States National Security Agency · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Law · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,83 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |