Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Establishing a Continuum from Minimizing to Maximizing Bureaucrats

State Agency Head Preferences for Governmental Expansion—A Typology of Administrator Growth Postures, 1964–98

Bibliographic Data

ID6358979
AuthorsCynthia J Bowling, Chung‐lae Cho, Deil S Wright
Year2004
Volume64
Issue4
Pages489-499
Publication date2004-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00394.x
OpenAlexW2158844191
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited27

Scholars have long suspected the blanket description of bureaucrats as “budget maximizers” is simplistic and inaccurate. This article provides empirical grounds for questioning that description and enhances our understanding of bureaucratic fiscal preferences. Bureaucratic preferences for expansion are distributed along a continuum. A typology of agency heads' expansion preferences is developed and related to Downs's typology of bureaucrats. Data from eight surveys of state agency heads (1964–98) enable us to trace administrators' preferences for expansion over four decades. These preferences vary substantially in any single survey year and reflect trends across these years. Notably, a substantial proportion of agency heads opted for no expansion in their own agency's programs and expenditures or in the state's overall budget. This typology challenges conventional conceptions of bureaucrats' maximizing preferences, advances alternative interpretations about budget minimizing, and fills an important gap in budget and bureaucracy theory

Agency (philosophy · Bureaucracy · Economics · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science · Typology · Computer Science · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Law · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Do Institutions Make Street‐Level Bureaucrats Prosocial? Agent‐Based Evidence Shows That New Public Management Does Not

    Open Access•Nissim Cohen, Teddy Lazebnik•European Policy Analysis•2025

  • State-Level Measures of Institutional Budgetary Influence from the American State Administrators Project

    Open Access•Nelson C Dometrius, Cynthia J Bowling et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2013

  • Citizen Dissatisfaction Leads to Budget Cuts, or Not

    Open Access•Nai‐Ling Kuo•Australian Journal of Public…•2012

  • Perceptions of Federal Aid Impacts on State Agencies

    C-L Cho, Chung‐lae Cho et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2006

  • U.S. agency growth aspirations and the effect of ideological extremism

    Open Access•Susan Webb Yackee•Public Administration Review•2023

  • The Devolution Revolution in Intergovernmental Relations in the 1990s

    C-L Cho, Chung‐lae Cho•Journal of Public Administration…•2004

  • The “Revolt in Dullsville” Revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey L Brudney, Deil S Wright•Public Administration Review•2009

  • From Maximizing to Minimizing

    Open Access•Theodore Arapis, Cynthia J Bowling et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2020

  • Taming the Bureaucracy

    William T Gormley, William T Jr Gormley•Taming the Bureaucracy•1989

  • Inside Bureaucracy

    Anthony Downs, Anthony J Downs•1967

  • Administrative behavior

    Herbert Alexander Simon•Administrative behavior•1976

  • Laboratories of democracy

    Open Access•Adam Ruben•Science•2018

  • State Government and Economic Performance

    Paul Brace•State government and economic…•1994

  • Agency Strategies and Executive Review

    Lance T Leloup, William B Moreland•Public Administration Review•1978

  • Congress and the Bureaucracy

    John D Lees, John Lees•International Affairs•1980

  • Explaining Government Growth in the U.S. States

    Open Access•James Garand, James C Garand•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Managing Carrots and Sticks

    C-L Cho, Chung‐lae Cho et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2001

  • Revisiting Administrative Reform in the American States

    Open Access•Jeffrey L Brudney, Deil S Wright•Public Administration Review•2002

  • Macro-Budgetary Adaptations to Fiscal Stress in Industrialized Democracies

    Allen Schick•Public Administration Review•1986

  • Micro-Budgetary Adaptations to Fiscal Stress in Industrialized Democracies

    Allen Schick•Public Administration Review•1988

  • Circumventing the Glass Ceiling

    Angela M Bullard, Deil S Wright•Public Administration Review•1993

  • Reinventing Government in the American States

    Jeffrey L Brudney, F Ted Hebert et al.•Public Administration Review•1999

  • Change and Continuity in State Administration

    Cynthia J Bowling, Deil S Wright•Public Administration Review•1998

  • The Growth of Government in the United States

    David Lowery, William D Berry•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Bureaucrats, Legislators, and the Size of Government

    Open Access•Gary J Miller, Terry M Moe•American Political Science Review•1983

  • Agency Requests, Gubernatorial Support and Budget Success in State Legislatures

    Open Access•Ira Sharkansky•American Political Science Review•1968

  • Clashing Beliefs Within the Executive Branch

    Open Access•Joel D Aberbach, Bert A Rockman•American Political Science Review•1976

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,36
Citation span2004 - 2025 (22)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae