Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluating the New Federalism

National Goals and Local Implementors

Bibliographic Data

ID6360239
AuthorsCarl E Van Horn (corresponding author)
Year1979
Volume39
Issue1
Pages17-17
Publication date1979-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/3110372
OpenAlexW2317174730
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited1

The widely recognized shortcomings of many of the Great Society programs, pressure by state and local officials for more autonomy, and the political philosophy of the Nixon administration combined to bring about dramatic reforms in social policy delivery in the United States during the 1970s. Those changes, dubbed the New Federalism, came about through federally-funded programs that, in contrast to previous categorical programs, were implemented by elected officials in states, counties, and cities.' The policy statements and actions of President Carter and the Democratic Congress indicate that with some modifications national policy makers remain committed to the central feature of the New Federalism: the decentralization of power to local implementors after broad national goals have been established. This article examines the implementation of three legislative components of the New Federalism in order to determine the broad patterns of benefit distribution and governance resulting from it. The laws that will be considered in this brief overview are the State and Local Assistance Act or General Revenue Sharing, the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA), and the Housing and Community Development Act, which is typically called Community Development Block Grants or CDBG. Together they furnish nearly one-third of all federal aid to state and local governments

Business · Federalism · Political science · Politics · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Law · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Administration

  • Implementation and Safety Regulation

    Open Access•Mary K Marvel•Administration & Society•1982

  • Block Grants and Urban Policies

    Open Access•E Terrence Jones, Emerald Jones•Policy Studies Journal•1980

  • Policy Recommendations for Multi-Actor Implementation

    Open Access•Laurence J O''Toole, Laurence J O’toole et al.•Journal of Public Policy•1986

  • Administrative Decentralization and Political Power

    Herbert Kaufman•Public Administration Review•1969

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,07
Citation span1980 - 1986 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae