Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The National Guard

State versus National Control

Bibliographic Data

ID6360934
AuthorsSamuel J Newland (corresponding author)
Year1989
Volume49
Issue1
Pages68-68
Publication date1989-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/977231
OpenAlexW2014132329
LanguageEN

Beginning with the refusals by the Governors of California (January 1985) and Maine (March 1986) to deploy Guardsmen to Honduras for training exercises,1 considerable press coverage has been given to the issue of who controls the National Guard. The issue has since received additional publicity through the Montgomery Amendment2 to the Fiscal Year 1987 Department of Defense Authorization Act (which removed the authority of governors to veto training on the basis of location) and suits brought against the Department of Defense first by Minnesota Governor Rudy Perpich and later by Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis. In both suits the Governors unsuccessfully sought to overturn the Montgomery Amendment and retain the state's ability to veto training missions scheduled through the Department of the Army and the National Guard Bureau.3 Both decisions were appealed and the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against Dukakis in October 1988

Algorithm · Guard (computer science · National guard · Political science · State (computer science · Computer Science · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Military and Defense Studies · Public Administration

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae