Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Responsibility Budgeting at the Air Force Materiel Command

Bibliographic Data

ID6362018
AuthorsMichael Barzelay (London School of Economics and Political Science), Fred Thompson (Willamette University)
Year2006
Volume66
Issue1
Pages127-138
Publication date2006-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00561.x
OpenAlexW2024421363
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

Th e case study reported here challenges conventional wisdom about the feasibility of implementing responsibil-ity budgeting and accounting practices in U.S. govern-ment. A variant of this practice took root and operated eff ectively in a large federal agency — the Air Force Materiel Command — during the period of study. Contrary to conventional wisdom, implementing a meaningful form of responsibility budgeting and ac-counting does not require changes in public management policies or systemic institutional reform. However, the evidence shows that instituting practices of responsibility budgeting and accounting may require considerable administrative ingenuity in adapting the generic practice to the situation at hand. R esponsibility budgeting and accounting is a well-known generic practice for managing organizations that produce goods or deliver services, whether for sale or not. Systemic features of responsibility budgeting and accounting include del-egated and focused responsibility for resource utiliza-tion and results. Usually, budgets are performance targets, whereas accounts measure their degree of accomplishment with some accuracy. Responsibility budgeting and accounting is theoretically appealing — and widely practiced in the private sector — because it solves problems of organizational coordination and control that arise in pursuing such goals as routinely cost-eff ective operations. Th e public management policies and organizational routines of government agencies in New Zealand

Agency (philosophy · Business · Economics · Government (linguistics · Ingenuity · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Accounting · Accounting and Organizational Management · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Noaa's Resurrection of Program Budgeting

    Open Access•William F West, Eric Lindquist et al.•Public Administration Review•2009

  • "Netcentric" Organization

    Open Access•Nancy Roberts, Fred Thompson•Public Administration Review•2006

  • The New Public Management

    Michael Barzelay•The New Public Management•2019

  • Buying in a Businesslike Fashion— And Paying More

    Open Access•Joseph Besselman, Ashish Arora et al.•Public Administration Review•2000

  • Working Capital Fund Pricing Policies

    Open Access•Edward G Keating, Susan M Gates•Public Administration Review•2002

  • Program and Responsibility Cost Accounting

    Francis E Mcgilvery•Public Administration Review•1968

  • Matching Responsibilities with Tactics

    Fred Thompson•Public Administration Review•1993

  • Management Control and the Pentagon

    Fred Thompson•Public Administration Review•1991

  • Usda's Pioneering Performance Budget

    Ralph S Roberts•Public Administration Review•1960

  • A Management Accounts Structure

    Francis E Mcgilvery•Public Administration Review•1966

  • Public Administration at the Millennium

    Donald F Kettl•Journal of Public Administration…•2000

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,1
Citation span2006 - 2009 (4)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae