Gubernatorial Use of the Item Veto for Narrative Deletion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6362291 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Glenn Abney (Georgia State University), Thomas P Lauth (Georgia State University) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 492-503 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Administration Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/0033-3352.00202 |
| OpenAlex | W2034209647 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
Legislative use of narrative, such as conditions and riders, in appropriations bills has become common and has had negative consequences for the executive budget and veto, as well as for the legislative process. Some governors have used the item veto as a remedy. While they have not necessarily diminished the amount of narrative, they have achieved some protection of the executive budget and veto power. Their success depends greatly on the type of legal authority embodied in this constitutional power
Business · Economics · Embodied cognition · Law and economics · Legislature · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Veto · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|