Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effectiveness, efficiency, and equity tradeoffs in public programs

A citizen experiment

Bibliographic Data

ID6364237
AuthorsKenneth J Meier (0000-0002-6378-0855, Department of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public Affairs American University Washington DC USA, corresponding author), Jourdan Davis (0000-0002-0901-1430, Department of Political Science and Public Administration University of North Carolina‐Charlotte Charlotte North Carolina USA), Xiaoyang Xu (0000-0002-5970-1739, McCourt School of Public Policy Georgetown University Washington DC USA)
Year2023
Volume83
Issue6
Pages1462-1477
Publication date2023-06-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/puar.13690
OpenAlexW4381492321
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited60

Debates over public programs frequently focus on questions of effectiveness, equity, and efficiency and the tradeoff among these objectives. Missing from the literature is whether the general public cares about these tradeoffs, can perceive such differences, and will act on them. This article reports on two pre‐registered vignette experiments where the effectiveness, equity, and efficiency are assessed relative to experimental treatments focused on U.S. K‐12 education involving test scores, equality of test scores, and program costs. One experiment focuses on equity in race and the other on equity in income. The experiments show that the general public perceives differences in program effectiveness and equity, values both, and is unwilling to tradeoff one for the other. The public cares about program costs, but it lacks a sophisticated understanding of efficiency as a concept. Inequalities in income appear to influence equity concerns more than those involving race

Actuarial science · Business · Economics · Equity (law · Equity theory · Microeconomics · Political science · Public economics · Test (biology · Vignette · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · School Choice and Performance · Social Psychology

  • Heterogeneity in public service recruitment

    Tingli Qu, Nathan Favero et al.•International Public Management…•2026

  • When Markets and Democracy Coincide

    Open Access•Suyeon Jo, Kenneth J Meier•The American Review of Public…•2026

  • Citizen evaluation of school districts

    Carla Flink, Xiaoyang Xu et al.•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2026

  • Examining attitudes toward public participation across sectors

    Open Access•Anna A Amirkhanyan, Fei Roberts et al.•Public Administration•2024

  • Social Equity and Representative Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Ene Ikpebe, Bodunrin Akinrinmade et al.•Public Administration•2025

  • Symbolic Bureaucratic Representation and Client Cooperation

    Open Access•Youlang Zhang, Huan Wang•Public Administration•2024

  • Public Perceptions of the Administrative Values Tradeoff

    Open Access•Suyeon Jo, Kenneth J Meier•Public Administration•2024

  • Which Public Values are Most Important? Linking Political Ideology and Public Service Motivation to Public Values Preferences

    Open Access•Nathan Favero, Colt Jensen et al.•The American Review of Public…•2025

  • An editor's commencement

    Open Access•Jeremy L Hall•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Can different policy interventions work complementarily?-A survey experiment on policy compliance

    Open Access•Yunxin Li, Haoran Jiang et al.•Review of Policy Research•2025

  • Democratic politics and policy analysis

    Hank C Jenkins-Smith•Democratic politics and policy…•1990

  • Rates and the judgment of government performance

    Open Access•Oliver James, Gregg G Van Ryzin•Journal of Behavioral Public…•2019

  • The Politics of Income Inequality in the United States

    Open Access•Nathan J Kelly•The politics of income inequality…•2009

  • Behavioral Public Performance

    Open Access•Oliver James, Anne Lisbeth Olsen et al.•Behavioral Public Performance•2020

  • New Public Management and Citizens' Perceptions of Local Service Efficiency, Responsiveness, Equity and Effectiveness

    Rhys Andrews, Steven Van De Walle•Public Management Review•2013

  • The Opportunities and Limitations of Using Mechanical Turk (MTURK) in Public Administration and Management Scholarship

    Justin M Stritch, Mogens Jin Pedersen et al.•International Public Management…•2017

  • Policy Analysis

    David L Weimer, David Weimer et al.•Policy Analysis•2015

  • Equality and Efficiency

    Open Access•Russell Keat•Philosophical Books•1980

  • Citizen perceptions of public school efficiency

    E Brunner, Eric J Brunner et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • An MTurk Crisis? Shifts in Data Quality and the Impact on Study Results

    Open Access•Michael Chmielewski, Michael S Chmielewski et al.•Social Psychological and…•2020

  • About Capital in the Twenty-First Century

    Thomas Piketty•American Economic Review•2015

  • Sources of Public Service Improvement

    George A Boyne•Journal of Public Administration…•2003

  • Standards for Experimental Research

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz, Robin Pemantle•Journal of Experimental Political…•2015

  • Good Governance

    Open Access•G De Graaf, Hester Paanakker•The American Review of Public…•2014

  • Social equity in the data era

    Open Access•Erna Ruijer, Gregory A Porumbescu et al.•Public Administration Review•2022

  • Covid ‐19 emergency policies, financial security, and social equity

    Open Access•Brian Y An, Simon Porcher et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Inequity after death

    Open Access•Rebecca M Entre, Rebecca M Entress et al.•Public Administration Review•2022

  • Your Money, Your Life, or Your Freedom? A Discrete‐Choice Experiment on Trade‐Offs During a Public Health Crisis

    Open Access•Nicky Belle, Nicola Belle et al.•Public Administration Review•2021

  • Citizen (Dis)satisfaction

    Open Access•Anne Lisbeth Olsen, Asmus Leth Olsen•Public Administration Review•2015

  • Liberté, Égalité, Crédibilité

    Open Access•Anna A Amirkhanyan, Kenneth J Meier et al.•Public Administration Review•2022

  • Trust in public performance information

    Open Access•Lisa Hohensinn, Lisa Schmidthuber et al.•Public Administration Review•2022

  • Equity or Efficiency? Explaining Public Officials' Values

    Open Access•Marcos Fernández‐gutiérrez, Marcos Fernández Gutiérrez et al.•Public Administration Review•2018

  • Framing Effects under Different Uses of Performance Information

    Open Access•Paolo Belardinelli, Nicky Belle et al.•Public Administration Review•2018

  • Analyzing the Complexity of Performance Information Use

    Open Access•Richard M Walker, M Jin Lee et al.•Public Administration Review•2018

  • Sector Bias and the Credibility of Performance Information

    Open Access•Kenneth J Meier, Miyeon Song et al.•Public Administration Review•2021

  • Accountability Systems

    Open Access•Robert L Linn, Eva L Baker et al.•Educational Researcher•2002

  • The Politics of Achievement Gaps

    Open Access•Jon Valant, Daniel A Newark•Educational Researcher•2016

  • A Critique of Welfare Economics

    I M D Little•Economica•1958

  • Mayors, Partisanship, and Redistribution

    Open Access•Katherine Levine Einstein, David M Glick•Urban Affairs Review•2016

  • Goal Ambiguity in U.S. Federal Agencies

    Young Han Chun•Journal of Public Administration…•2004

  • Perceptual Bias and Public Programs

    Open Access•Kenneth J Meier, Austin P Johnson et al.•Public Administration Review•2019

  • Perceptions of Public and Private Performance

    Open Access•Ulrik Hvidman, Simon Calmar Andersen•Public Administration Review•2015

  • Citizen Attributions of Blame in Third‐Party Governance

    Open Access•John D Marvel, Amanda M Girth•Public Administration Review•2015

  • In Search of Social Equity in Public Administration

    Open Access•Jeremy L Hall•Public Administration Review•2022

  • How does performance management affect social equity? Evidence from New York City public schools

    Open Access•Weijie Wang•Public Administration Review•2022

  • Interpreting Performance Information

    Open Access•Martin Baekgaard, Søren Serritzlew•Public Administration Review•2015

  • Funding the Welfare State

    Open Access•Duane Swank•Political Studies•1998

  • Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Sarah Poggione•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • American Party Women

    Open Access•Tiffany D Barnes, Erin C Cassese•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • Ratio Bias and Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Rasmus T Pedersen•Political Psychology•2017

  • The Gender Gap in Ideology

    Open Access•Barbara Norrander, Clyde Wilcox•Political Behavior•2008

  • The Inseparability of Race and Partisanship in the United States

    Open Access•Sean Westwood, Erik Peterson•Political Behavior•2022

  • The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion

    Open Access•Toby Bolsen, James N Druckman et al.•Political Behavior•2014

  • Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Gregory A Huber et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Compared to What? How Social and Historical Reference Points Affect Citizens’ Performance Evaluations

    Anne Lisbeth Olsen, Asmus Leth Olsen•Journal of Public Administration…•2017

  • Unconscious Bias in Citizens’ Evaluations of Public Sector Performance

    John D Marvel•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • Can Hierarchy Dodge Bullets? Examining Blame Attribution in Military Contracting

    Open Access•Austin P Johnson, Nehemia Geva et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2019

  • A Public Management for All Seasons

    Open Access•Christopher Hood•Public Administration•1991

  • The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined

    Open Access•Barry J Gaines, Brian J Gaines et al.•Political Analysis•2006

  • The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Suzanna De Boef et al.•American Political Science Review•2004

  • Explaining the Persistence of Health Disparities

    J Daw•American Journal of Sociology•2015

Unique citing works10
Citations per year3,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae