Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

OMB and the Central Management Problem

Is Another Reorganization the Answer

Bibliographic Data

ID6364274
AuthorsPeter M Benda, Charles H Levine
Year1986
Volume46
Issue5
Pages379-379
Publication date1986-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/975776
OpenAlexW2331474064
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited1

From the time of its inception in 1921, in addition to its primary role as the President's budget staff, BoB/ OMB has been charged with broad responsibilities. Although historically some controversy has surrounded what properly encompasses, the traditional conception of BoB/OMB's managerial function may be formulated in the following terms: to provide leadership on the President's behalf in addressing general problems bearing on the organization and effectiveness of the executive branch and to assist in the design and implementation of governmentwide strategies aimed at enhancing the ability of federal agencies to carry out their statutory missions. This general conception of the agency's role has its roots in the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921 and has since been reinforced by a series of Executive Orders and reorganization plans, up to and including the reorganization of 1970 which transformed the Bureau of the Budget into the Office of Management and Budget. However, concern about BoB/OMB's institutional capacity to provide management direction for the executive branch has been a persistent theme throughout much of the agency's history. President Roosevelt's Committee on Administrative Management (the Brownlow Committee) was the first in a long series of presidential advisory groups and panels to urge that concrete steps be taken to strengthen BoB/ OMB's management role. With some notable exceptions, most of these recommendations were never implemented and, in the view of many observers, the few efforts that have been made to shore up the side of BoB/OMB's operations generally have proven of only limited or temporary value. In the past few years, recognition of some of the recurring problems which have hampered OMB's ability to provide leadership in the management affairs of government has led to several recommendations for reorganizing responsibility for government-wide management improvement efforts.' One of the more ambitious current reform proposals is sponsored by Senator William Roth of Delaware, chairman of the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs. On March 26, 1986, Roth

Political science · Accounting and Organizational Management · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy

  • Neutral and Responsive Competence

    Open Access•Patrick J Wolf•Administration & Society•1999

  • A Framework for Assessing Incentives in Results‐Based Management

    Open Access•James E Swiss•Public Administration Review•2005

  • The President's private sector survey on cost control

    Open Access•Robert M Hayes•Government Information Quarterly•1986

Citations per year0.07
Citation span1999 - 2005 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae