Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

He Says, She Says

Gender and Worklife

Bibliographic Data

ID6366014
AuthorsMary Hale (corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume59
Issue5
Pages410-410
Publication date1999-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/977424
OpenAlexW1978204545
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited5

Introduction Many studies have shown that women often encounter glass ceilings when they try to make their way up the organizational promotion ladder. They often feel excluded from power, sidetracked, and socially isolated. The literature has suggested that men are reluctant to give up power; they are uncomfortable dealing with women, whom they believe are different from themselves and are, therefore, unreliable or unpredictable. This article explores some of these themes through conversations with men and women about how gender affects their workplace. Some of the themes from the literature were confirmed these conversations, others were modified or expanded, and new ones emerged. The result is a better understanding of how gender affects work life, and suggestions for creating a more equal, and calmer, workforce. I propose a communication model that is useful for diagnostics and intervention organizations that want to improve workplace relations for current and potential future employees. The study described here is the result of the exploratory study of this model, the Conversation Project. This ongoing project is aimed at understanding the perceptions and perspectives of male and female managers and administrators(1) and how those perceptions of gender affect the workplace. Male and female public administration professionals were asked to talk about how gender affects their work relationships; what they think about gender relations organizations, as they relate to the work they do; and what issues they consider most important. The Conversation Project is unique because it incorporates men's perspectives, insights, and understandings alongside those of women a group conversation about the different or shared realities of their work-life relationships. Examining different points of view on this issue elucidates how professionals perceive gender as shaping work relations and experiences; addition, it illuminates how these experiences influence behavior that maintains unequal employment opportunities. My assumption is that gaining insight into how professionals perceive gender relations the workplace can help us to more fully understand what is involved changing the current reality organizations and can improve efforts to end systemic gender-based discrimination. Not only will such improvements help women achieve equality, they will also help men feel to more comfortable working with women. The knowledge generated by this project will be useful to administrators and managers who want to understand the factors that impede women's advancement; to researchers working to identify the factors that perpetuate gender inequality organizations; and to decision makers who want to initiate a process for constructive change. Research Framework and Methodology This study explored how professional men and women public-sector workplaces perceive the relationship between gender and their `lived' work experiences. The study was built on a focus-group design with in-depth, follow-up telephone interviews. The data are based on two focus group discussions and interviews with public administration professionals, both conducted 1995. The participants included 23 men and women aged 36-56.(2) The 12 participants the first group were public administration faculty from public universities six states; the 11 participants the second group were midlevel practitioners and top-level administrators from public-sector organizations and government agencies eight states.(3) Practitioners and academicians were separated to gather data from individuals who contribute to current thinking and practice two different areas within the public administration profession--those practicing in the field and those instructing current and future professionals. While public administration programs public universities and government organizations differ from public workplace arenas, both are heavily male-dominated and are assumed to be typical of workplaces terms of gender relations, prejudice, and stereotypes

Political science · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Work-Family Balance Challenges

  • Understanding the Emotional Labor of Public Health Equity Work

    Open Access•Chad Abresch, Carol Gilbert et al.•Journal of Racial and Ethnic…•2023

  • What’s going on down there? Subtitle sexism and gender representation in Masters of the Universe

    Alice Armstrong, Alice J Armstrong et al.•The Journal of Popular Television•2025

  • Family‐Friendly Human Resource Policy

    Open Access•Jungin Kim, Jung In Kim et al.•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Social Equity in Public Administration

    Open Access•Brandi Blessett, Jennifer Dodge et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2019

  • Perceived Organizational Ethics and Skepticism of Women's Employment

    Open Access•Sarah Valentine, Sean Valentine et al.•Psychological Reports•2006

  • Differences in Male and Female Employees’ Personal Attributes? Myth or a Reasonable Assumption

    Open Access•Vibeke Lehmann Nielsen•Gender Issues•2014

  • Practical Experience

    Aimee L Franklin, Carol Ebdon•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2005

  • Emotional Labor Meanings, Gender, and Culture

    Mary E Guy, Aisha Azhar•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2018

  • Finding A Voice

    Delysa Burnier•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2003

  • Loaded dice

    A Crabtree, Chris Shiel•Gender and Education•2018

  • Organizational Practices and Second-Generation Gender Bias

    Open Access•Maria J D’agostino, Maria D’Agostino et al.•The American Review of Public…•2022

  • Rethinking Diversity in Public Organizations for the 21st Century

    Open Access•Sally Coleman Selden, Frank Selden•Administration & Society•2001

  • The Glass Ceiling Revisited

    Open Access•Rick Caceres-Rodriguez•Administration & Society•2013

  • Women in Public Administration

    Open Access•Hindy Lauer Schachter•Administration & Society•2017

  • Creating Reality Through Administrative Practice

    Open Access•O C Mcswite•Administration & Society•2004

  • Women's Jobs, Men's Jobs

    Open Access•Mary E Guy, Meredith A Newman•Public Administration Review•2004

  • Determinants of objective and subjective success of men and women

    Open Access•Monique Lortie-Lussier, Monique Lortie‐lussier et al.•International Review of…•2005

  • Gendered Discourse in the Political Behavior of Adolescents

    Cindy Simon Rosenthal, Jocelyn Jones et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Lillian Borrone

    Open Access•Hindy Lauer Schachter•Public Administration Review•2008

  • Empowering the Female City Manager to Succeed

    Open Access•P Edward French, Robert D Eskridge•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Personal Attributes and Institutions

    Vibeke Lehmann Nielsen•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • Gender Equality in the Academy

    Open Access•Kristen Renwick Monroe, William F Chiu et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2010

  • The foundations of policy analysis

    Garry D Brewer•The foundations of policy analysis•1983

  • Career Advancement

    Open Access•Meredith A Newman•The American Review of Public…•1993

  • Public Managers in the States

    Rita Mae Kelly, Mary E Guy et al.•Public Administration Review•1991

  • An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein

    Open Access•Paul A Sabatier, Paul Sabatier•Policy Sciences•1988

  • Through the Glass Ceiling

    Katherine C Naff•Public Administration Review•1994

Unique citing works22
Citations per year0,88
Citation span2001 - 2025 (25)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae