Municipal Enterprises and Taxing and Spending Policies
Public Avoidance and Fiscal Illusions
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6366113 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Charlie B Tyer (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1989 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 249-249 |
| Data de publicação | 1989-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Public Administration Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2307/977007 |
| OpenAlex | W2332915940 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 10 |
Municipalities provide some public services through business-type enterprises which are owned and run by government and which are financed by fees or charges for the services. These activities differ from other types of municipal services in that they commonly support themselves and they sometimes generate revenues beyond their costs. They are usually set apart from the rest of the government's activities by fund accounting techniques as separate funds, usually called enterprise funds. The impact of such funds has received increasing attention in the literature on municipal government and finance and on public budgeting generally.1 Rubin, for example, using Illinois as a case study, has discussed the possible impact of municipal enterprises generally. Vogt has examined North Carolina cities, DeHoog and Swanson have reported on Florida's cities, and DeLorenzo has looked at New York municipalities. The results of these studies are mixed. DeLorenzo found some evidence existed that New York cities with enterprise funds tended to spend more on public services than other cities, suggesting that enterprise profits were transferred to general fund activities to enhance services over and beyond what municipal taxes would support. Vogt concluded that North Carolina cities with electric utilities used their profits to keep property taxes lower than they would otherwise have been. DeHoog and Swanson concluded that Florida cities used enterprise fund profits, primarily electricity funds, to compensate for lower tax bases and therefore did not follow the pattern found in either New York or North Carolina. Hence, the literature to date suggests that such enterprises may have varied impacts on municipal budgets and services, and it indicates that more research is needed on this dimension of public finance
Business · Economic policy · Economics · Fiscal policy · Illusion · Monetary economics · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Public spending · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Housing Market and Economics · Law · Psychology
Revenue generation and expenditure implications of municipal non-utility enterprises
Municipal response to the Great Recession
Enterprise fund transfers and their impact on governmental spending and revenue patterns of georgia municipalities
Implications Of Using Enterprise Funds To Account For Public Works Services
Benchmarking Florida’s Electric Power Enterprises
Comparing Alternative Service Delivery Modes
State Intervention in the Economy Why Is the United States Different From Other Mixed Economiesp
Does not‐for‐profit corporatization of local public services improve performance
Corporatization in the Public Sector
Nontraditional Public Enterprise as Local Economic Development Policy
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,29 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1992 - 2025 (34) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 10 |