Why Public Employees Rebel
Guerrilla Government in the Public Sector
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6366145 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gary E Hollibaugh (0000-0001-9844-2437, University of Pittsburgh), Matthew R Miles (0000-0002-8165-0851, Brigham Young University - Idaho, autor correspondente), Chad B Newswander (0009-0005-2719-310X, Brigham Young University - Idaho) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 64-74 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-11-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Public Administration Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/puar.13118 |
| OpenAlex | W2991391067 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 42 |
| Referências citadas | 33 |
Employee recalcitrance and employer reprisal are ever‐present conditions in public service. Yet we have limited knowledge of the forces that move administrators away from acquiescence and toward antagonism. The authors follow the theoretical thrust of behavioral public administration to better understand administrative behavior by targeting the determinants of guerrilla government actions. They do so by presenting the results of a conjoint experiment embedded in a survey of federal bureaucrats. Findings show that decisions to pursue guerrilla activities are conditional on a multitude of factors—namely, the bureaucrat's personal views of the directive as a policy solution, the compatibility of the directive with the bureaucrat's ethical framework, the status of the person issuing the directive, and the probability that the directive might cause harm to others. Notably, these decisions generally are not affected by the probability of retribution or the expected type thereof. However, they are affected by the magnitude of harm that may ensue if orders are obeyed and not resisted
Acquiescence · Business · Citizen journalism · Directive · Economics · Government (linguistics · Harm · Law and economics · Multitude · Political science · Politics · Public sector · Public service · Law · Policing Practices and Perceptions · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Regulation and Compliance Studies
Bureaucratic Resistance in Times of Democratic Backsliding
Public Administration and the Illiberal Challenge
Advancing public policy to expose it
The interactive effects of professionalism and politicization
A connotation to public sector creativity
Influence tactics and “second-order” change in schools
Populism and Public Bureaucracy During a Crisis – Insights from Israel
Promote or Deter
Does Size Matter for the Relationship Between Politics and Administration
Personality Traits and Agency Politicization
How Democratic Backsliding Shapes the Entry, Non‐Entry, and Waiting of Potential Civil Servants
The agency of (public) agencies
Populist attitudes among civil servants
Management of Multiple Accountabilities Through Setting Priorities
A taste for government employment also rests on its political flavor
Rethinking Loyalty and Competence in Presidential Appointments
A model of bureaucratic capacities against democratic backsliding
Bureaucracies' Strategies for Coping With Populism
Using behavioral science to improve compliance in government records management
The Burden of Bad Intentions
Systematic Review and Metasynthesis
The Organizational Dynamics of Bureaucratic Resistance to Undemocratic Pressures
Bureaucrats’ willingness to resist democratic backsliding
Does Policy Influence Hollow Out Public Managers’ Political Neutrality
Anti-Corruption Policy and Whistle-Blowing Intentions
Revisiting Public Values
Authorized Discretion
Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape
Career Civil Servants’ Socially Embedded Responses to Democratic Backsliding
Leading with dissent
It’s a match
How the political elite make decisions
Exploring administrative evil, the ethics of dissent, and guerrilla government in The Good Place
Unethical leadership, moral compensation, and ethical followership
When Are Nudges Desirable? Benefit Validity When Preferences Are Not Consistently Revealed
Does Administrative Burden Influence Public Support for Government Programs? Evidence from a Survey Experiment
Ministerial Leadership and Endorsement of Bureaucrats
Pursuing Consilience
Exit, Voice, and Sabotage
Breaking the rules, but for whom? How client characteristics affect frontline professionals’ prosocial rule-breaking behavior
Street‐level bureaucracy and democratic backsliding. Evidence from Poland
Technocrat or partisan cabinet ministers
The Unitary Executive
Whistle-Blowing
Essence of Decision
Above Politics
Emotional Labor
Cops, Teachers, Counselors
The Value of The Dichotomy
Whistle-Blowing
Public Service Motivation and Decisions to Report Wrongdoing in U.S. Federal Agencies
Behavioral Public Administration
Behavioral Public Administration ad fontes
Public Sector Governance Reform and the Motivation of Street‐Level Bureaucrats in Developing Countries
Ethical Climate and Rule Bending
Civil Servants and Their Constitutions
Red Tape
Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape
Thick Red Tape and the Thin Blue Line
Moral Leadership and Administrative Statesmanship
The Unbureaucratic Personality
Guerrilla Statesmanship
Does Administrative Burden Influence Public Support for Government Programs? Evidence from a Survey Experiment
Human Capital and Administrative Burden
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research
Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis
Mind the Gap
The Principal's Moral Hazard
Testing a Revised Measure of Public Service Motivation
Agency Retaliation Against Whistle-Blowers
The 2016 John Gaus Lecture
| Obras citantes distintas | 42 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 6 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 42 |