Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Hollow Realignment Partisan Change in a Candidate-Centered Era

Bibliographic Data

ID6367195
AuthorsMartin P Wattenberg, Martin Wattenberg (0000-0003-0904-4862, corresponding author)
Year1987
Volume51
Issue1
Pages58
Publication date1987-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/269014
OpenAlexW2077187800
LanguageEN
Citations received45

In 1984 identification with the Republican party increased to the point where the plurality of Democrats over Republicans reached its lowest point since such measurements began in 1952. Yet the realignment is a hollow one between two parties who still have a weak image in the public mind and an uncertain role in the future of American government. While the balance of power between the two parties shifted, the importance of political parties to the electorate remained at an historically weak level. Split-ticket voting continued to be high and roughly a third of the electorate had nothing to say-either positive or negative-about both the parties. In short, realignment occurred in 1984 without party revitalization and the reestablishment of the linkage between parties and candidates

Balance (ability · Computer security · Economics · Government (linguistics · Nothing · Point (geometry · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Politics of the United States · Power (physics · Realigning election · Socialism · Split-ticket voting · Ticket · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Public Administration

  • Partisan Models and the Search for Party Effects in the US Senate

    Barbara Sinclair•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Interest Group Theory

    Andrew Mcfarland•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Party Faithful

    John C Green•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • How Parties Nominate Presidents

    William G Mayer•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Comparative Advantage of State Interest Organization Research

    David Lowery, Virginia Gray•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Theories of Parties

    John H Aldrich, Jeffrey D Grynaviski•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Road Less Taken

    Daniel M Shea•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Party Coalitions in the US Congress

    D Brady, David W Brady•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Social and Economic Justice Movements and Organizations

    Dara Z Strolovitch, M David Forrest et al.•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus?

    Kay Lehman Schlozman•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Party Nominating Procedures and Recruitment—State and Local Level

    Raymond J La Raja•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Activists, Influence, and Representation in American Elections

    Walter J Stone•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Methodological Issues in the Study of Political Parties

    Hubert Noël, Hans Noel•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Political Parties and Consultants

    David B Magleby•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • State Parties Research

    Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Mobilization and Influence of Business Interests

    Mark Alan Smith•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • What a Difference Twenty-Five Years Makes

    David W Rohde•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Interest Groups and Agendas

    F R Baumgartner•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Interest Groups in American Elections

    Clyde Wilcox, Rentaro Iida•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The State of Research on Political Parties and Interest Groups

    L Sandy Maisel, Jeffrey M Berry•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Evolution of National Party Organizations

    Paul S Herrnson•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Lobbying and Influence

    Beth L Leech•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Urban Interest Groups

    Jeffrey M Berry•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Evolution and Alteration of American Party Coalitions

    Mark D Brewer•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Pure Partisan Institution

    Byron E Shafer•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Linking Political Parties and Interest Groups

    M T Heaney•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The President, Party Politics, and Constitutional Development

    Sidney M Milki, Sidney M Milkis et al.•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Winning Isn't Everything

    Ronald B Rapoport•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Methodological Perspectives on Interest Groups

    Scott H Ainsworth, Scott Ainsworth•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • American Political Parties

    Joel H Silbey•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups

    Michael T Heaney, Louis Sandy Maisel et al.•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • If Men Stayed Home … The Gender Gap in Recent Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Laura R Winsky Mattei, Franco Mattei•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Temporal dynamics of partisan identity fusion and prosociality during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

    Antonia Misch, Grant Fergusson et al.•Self and Identity•2018

  • The Reagan Democrat Phenomenon

    Open Access•Julio Borquez•Politics & Policy•2005

  • Advertising and the Image of Politicians in Evolving and Established Democracies

    Wojciech Cwalina, Andrzej Falkowski et al.•Journal of Political Marketing•2005

  • Political Marketing

    Andrzej Falkowski, Wojciech Cwalina•Journal of Political Marketing•2012

  • Party Systems and Realignments in the United States, 1868-2004

    Open Access•James E Campbell•Social Science History•2006

  • Political Impression Management

    Christ’l De Landtsheer, Christ'l De Landtsheer et al.•Journal of Political Marketing•2008

  • The Berelson Paradox Reconsidered Intention-Behavior Changers in U.S. and Swedish Election Campaigns

    Donald Granberg, Sören Holmberg•Public Opinion Quarterly•1990

  • The Electorate's Partisan Evaluations

    John G Geer•Public Opinion Quarterly•1991

  • The Structure of Attitudes Toward Groups

    Open Access•Frank P Zinni, Franco Mattei et al.•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • Image formation, the low involvement viewer, and televised political advertising

    Donald T Cundy•Political Communication•1990

  • The Structure and Dynamics of Group Politics

    Open Access•Frank P Zinni, Laurie A Rhodebeck et al.•Political Behavior•1997

  • The 1984 election as Anthony downs and Stanley Kelley might interpret it

    Open Access•Richard W Boyd, Richard Boyd et al.•Political Behavior•1988

  • Election campaign volatility in Sweden and the United States

    Open Access•Donald Granberg, Sören Holemberg•Electoral Studies•1991

Unique citing works45
Citations per year1,18
Citation span1988 - 2018 (31)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 45

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae