Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Expectations for Policy Change and Participation

Bibliographic Data

ID6367646
AuthorsCurtis Bram (0000-0002-9604-5793, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas , Richardson, TX, US)
Year2023
Volume87
Issue4
Pages1000-1012
Publication date2023-12-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfad047
OpenAlexW4389672351
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited32

What policy changes do people expect from elections, and how do these expectations influence the decision to vote? This paper seeks to understand the relationship between people’s expectations and their subsequent voting behavior by examining beliefs about what candidates would actually do if given political power. I start with a survey of political scientists and compare their forecasts about what presidential candidates will accomplish to those of the general population. Public respondents expected much more legislation to result from the 2020 election. This comparison suggests an underestimation by the public of the impediments that the separation of powers poses to passing legislation. The study further reveals that voters expected much more policy change than nonvoters did, with high expectations serving as a strong predictor of validated voter turnout. These results support explanations for the decision to vote that center on the policy benefits that people believe their preferred candidate will deliver

Economics · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Population · Power (physics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Public economics · Public opinion · Public relations · Sociology · Turnout · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Gender Politics and Representation · Psychology · Law · Public Administration · Social Psychology

  • Public perceptions of responsible AI in local government

    Open Access•Anne David, Tan Yigitcanlar et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2025

  • The Donor Went Down to Georgia

    Open Access•Charles Nathan, Arvind Krishnamurthy et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Stepping Up the Political Ladder

    Open Access•William Marble, Nathan Lee et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Making Sense of Sensitivity

    Open Access•Carlos Cinelli, Chad Hazlett•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•2020

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Identifying the “Downsian Ceiling”

    Samuel Merrill, B Grofman et al.•Journal of Political Institutions…•2022

  • The Neglected Role of the Status Quo in Models of Issue Voting

    B Grofman•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Two Types of Neutrality

    Sung-Jin Yoo•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Does Homeownership Influence Political Behavior? Evidence from Administrative Data

    Arnold Bennett Hall, Andrew Hall et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • A Time-Series Analysis of External Efficacy

    A Chamberlain•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Family Life and American Politics

    Eric Plutzer, Michael Mcburnett•Public Opinion Quarterly•1991

  • Voice is Not Enough

    Stacy G Ulbig, Ulbig•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Education, public support for institutions, and the separation of powers

    Open Access•Sivaram Cheruvu•Political Science Research and…•2023

  • The Most Important Election of Our Lifetime

    Open Access•Curtis Bram•Political Psychology•2023

  • The political consequences of alienation-based and indifference-based voter abstention

    Open Access•James Adams, James E Adams et al.•Political Behavior•2006

  • Who Votes for the Future? Information, Expectations, and Endogeneity in Economic Voting

    Open Access•Dean Lacy, D P Christenson•Political Behavior•2017

  • Turnout as a Habit

    Open Access•John H Aldrich, Jacob M Montgomery et al.•Political Behavior•2011

  • Political efficacy and trust

    Open Access•Stephen C Craig, Richard G Niemi et al.•Political Behavior•1990

  • The Effect of the Size of Voting Blocs on Incumbents' Roll‐Call Voting and the Asymmetric Polarization of Congress

    Open Access•Daniel M Butler•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Education and Political Participation

    Open Access•Claire Willeck, Tali Mendelberg•Annual Review of Political Science•2022

  • Retrospective Voting Reconsidered

    Andrew Healy, N Malhotra•Annual Review of Political Science•2013

  • Downsian Voting and the Separation of Powers

    Dean Lacy, Philip Paolino•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • The Policy Basis of Measured Partisan Animosity in the United States

    Open Access•Lilla V Orr, Gregory A Huber•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • The Nature of Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Nicholas C Dias, Nicholas Dias et al.•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Education and Political Participation

    Open Access•Mikael Persson•British Journal of Political…•2015

  • Habit Formation and Political Behaviour

    Open Access•Donald P Green, Ron Shachar•British Journal of Political…•2000

  • Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Karp, Susan Banducci et al.•British Journal of Political…•2008

  • Economic Expectations and Voting Behavior in United States House and Senate Elections

    Open Access•James H Kuklinski, Darrell M West•American Political Science Review•1981

  • The Downsian roots of affective polarization

    Open Access•C Algara, Roi Zur•Electoral Studies•2023

  • Enhancing Electoral Equality

    Open Access•Karl-Oskar Lindgren, Sven Oskarsson et al.•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham, Milan W Svolik•American Political Science Review•2020

  • American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•G Bingham Powell•American Political Science Review•1986

Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae