Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Secularism and American Political Behavior

Bibliographic Data

ID6367704
AuthorsGeoffrey C Layman (0000-0002-5955-920X, University of Notre Dame professor of political science at the , Notre Dame, IN, USA), David E Campbell (0000-0002-6360-7315, American Democracy at the University of Notre Dame Packey J. Dee Professor of , Notre Dame, IN, USA), John C Green (Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron director emeritus of the , Akron, OH, USA), Nathanael Gratias Sumaktoyo (0000-0002-7932-3691, University of Konstanz postdoctoral fellow at the , Konstanz, Germany)
Year2021
Volume85
Issue1
Pages79-100
Publication date2021-08-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfab011
OpenAlexW3177025819
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited31

The recent growth of the secular population in the United States has implications for American politics. However, our understanding of these implications has been hindered by oversimplified concepts and measures that equate secularism with non-religion. We separate the two concepts, distinguishing “non-religiosity,” or the absence of religion, from “secularism,” or a positive embrace of secular beliefs and identities. Using original national-sample cross-sectional and panel surveys, we introduce new measures of secularism, evaluate their properties, and assess their connection to political attitudes and behavior. We find a clear distinction between secularism and non-religiosity in the American public and show that secularism is more closely related than non-religiosity to political attitudes, identifications, and engagement. In fact, while secularism is related to changes over time in political orientations, non-religiosity is not

Political science · Politics · Religiosity · Secularism · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Law · Social Psychology

  • State and faith

    Mehmet Gurses, Jonathan Fox et al.•Journal of Southeast European and…•2024

  • The stars down to the ballot box

    Open Access•N Huhe, Stratos Patrikio•European Journal of Political…•2026

  • Americans' views of religion in public life

    Open Access•David Sikkink, Greg Wurm•Social Science Research•2026

  • Religion and the 2020 Presidential Election

    Open Access•David E Campbell, James R G Kirk et al.•The Forum•2020

  • Neither religious nor rational

    Open Access•Stratos Patrikio, N Huhe•West European Politics•2024

  • The secular voter

    Open Access•Geoffrey C Layman, David E Campbell et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • Fuel on the Fire

    Open Access•David E Campbell, Geoffrey C Layman et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • The links between basic human values and political secularism

    Open Access•Kai Arzheimer•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • A Short Scale for Measuring Political Secularism

    Open Access•Kai Arzheimer•Politics and Religion•2022

  • God’s country

    Open Access•Levi G Allen, James R G Kirk•Politics and Religion•2025

  • Religiosity matters

    Open Access•Alexis Bibeau, Evelyne Brie et al.•Politics and Religion•2023

  • Membership in a stigmatized religious minority and political support

    Open Access•Ewa Golebiowska•Politics and Religion•2024

  • Secularism, sorting, and Americans' political knowledge

    Open Access•L Perry•Social Forces•2025

  • Will Americans Vote for an Atheist

    Open Access•David E Campbell, Geoffrey C Layman et al.•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2025

  • The LGBT Politics of Religious Nones

    Open Access•P Schwadel, K Burke et al.•Sociology of Religion•2025

  • Mooring Christian Nationalism

    D E Sherkat, Derek Lehman et al.•Sociological Quarterly•2024

  • Counterfactuals and Causal Inference

    Open Access•Stephen L Morgan, C Winship•Counterfactuals and Causal…•2014

  • Critique of Pure Reason

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, G Banham et al.•Critique of Pure Reason, Second…•2007

  • A critique of the cross-lagged panel model.

    Ellen L Hamaker, Rebecca M Kuiper et al.•Psychological Methods•2015

  • Structural Equations with Latent Variables

    Open Access•K A Bollen•Structural Equations with Latent…•1989

  • The Oxford Handbook of Religion and American Politics

    James Guth, James L Guth et al.•The Oxford handbook of religion…•2009

  • The Total Survey Error Approach

    Herbert F Weisberg•Total Survey Error Approach•2005

  • The Nonreligious

    Phil Zuckerman, Luke W Galen et al.•The Nonreligious•2016

  • The American Ethos

    Herbert Mcclosky, John Zaller•American Ethos•1984

  • Voice and Equality

    Henry Brady, Sidney Verba et al.•Voice and Equality•1995

  • Secular and Liminal

    Open Access•Chaeyoon Lim, Carol Ann Macgregor et al.•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2010

  • Of Crusades and Culture Wars

    David C Barker, Jon Hurwitz et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Beyond the Self

    J H Fowler, Cindy D Kam•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • American Republican Religion? Disentangling the Causal Link Between Religion and Politics in the US

    Open Access•Stratos Patrikio•Political Behavior•2008

  • The Spirit of Capitalism? Religious Doctrine, Values, and Economic Attitude Constructs

    Open Access•David C Barker, Christopher J Carman•Political Behavior•2000

  • Measurement Error and the Structure of Attitudes

    Donald P Green, Jack Citrin•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • The Party Faithful

    Open Access•David E Campbell, John C Green et al.•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • Faith and the Environment

    James L Guth, James Guth et al.•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Political Sophistication and Policy Reasoning

    Paul Goren•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Putting Politics First

    Open Access•David E Campbell, Geoffrey C Layman et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Wars and Rumours of Wars

    Open Access•Geoffrey C Layman, John C Green•British Journal of Political…•2006

  • Religion and Secularism among American Party Activists

    Open Access•Geoffrey C Layman, Christopher L Weaver•Politics and Religion•2016

  • Secularism, Religion, and Political Choice in the United States

    Open Access•T Randolph Beard, Robert B Ekelund et al.•Politics and Religion•2013

  • Explaining Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference

    Open Access•M Hout, C S Fischer•Sociological Science•2014

  • The Humanitarian Foundation of Public Support for Social Welfare

    Stanley Feldman, Marco R Steenbergen•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • The Estimation of Measurement Error in Panel Data

    David E Wiley, James A Wiley et al.•American Sociological Review•1970

  • Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference

    M Hout, C S Fischer•American Sociological Review•2002

  • Attitude Attribution

    Open Access•Henry E Brady, Paul M Sniderman•American Political Science Review•1985

  • What You Can-and Can't-Do With Three-Wave Panel Data

    Open Access•Vaisey, Stephen Vaisey et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2017

Unique citing works16
Citations per year2,67
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae