Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Long Shadow of the Big Lie

How Beliefs about the Legitimacy of the 2020 Election Spill Over onto Future Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID6368658
AuthorsMatthew Levendusky (0000-0003-3295-1276, University of Pennsylvania), Sheila Patterson (0000-0002-2377-5509, Research Analyst, Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA), Michele F Margolis (0000-0003-2466-9553), Michele Margolis (University of Pennsylvania), Yotam Ophir (0000-0001-5049-7906, University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Dror Walter (0000-0001-9870-998X, Georgia State University), Kathleen Hall Jamieson (0000-0002-4167-3688, Elizabeth Ware Packard Professor in the Annenberg School for Communication, and Director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA)
Year2024
Volume88
Issue3
Pages933-961
Publication date2024-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfae047
OpenAlexW4403951699
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited16

Has the “big lie”—the false claim that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump—shaped citizens’ views of the legitimacy of other US elections? We argue that it has. Those who believe Trump’s claim, whom we call election skeptics, lack confidence in elections for two interrelated reasons. First, because they think 2020 was inaccurately and unfairly conducted, they think that other elections will suffer a similar fate, and hence think these elections are illegitimate even before any votes are cast. Second, while most voters think elections are less legitimate when their preferred candidate loses, this effect will be especially large for election skeptics, because voter fraud gives them a mechanism to explain their candidate’s loss. Using an original panel dataset spanning the 2020 and 2022 elections, we show strong support for these hypotheses. This has important implications for our elections, and their legitimacy, moving forward

Legitimacy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Shadow (psychology · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Law · Public Administration · Social Psychology

  • Prebunking misinformation, perceptions about electoral security, and voting intentions

    Open Access•Vithika Salomi•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2025

  • Spreading anger, selling hope

    Kyungeun Jang, Young Min Baek•Behaviour and Information…•2026

  • Election Denial, Voter Confidence, and Political Behavior in the 2021 Georgia Senate Runoff Elections

    Open Access•Seth C Mckee, M V Hood et al.•American Politics Research•2025

  • The Politics of Enmity

    Open Access•Salil D Benegal, Thomas J Hayes et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Contingent Confidence

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton•PS Political Science & Politics•2025

  • Good Sports or Sore Losers

    Open Access•Alex Tolkin•Political Behavior•2025

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Democracy and the Market

    Open Access•Adam Przeworski•Democracy and the Market•1991

  • Losers' Consent

    Christopher Anderson, Christopher J Anderson et al.•Losers' consent•2005

  • Reliability of the Core Items in the General Social Survey

    Open Access•M Hout, O P Hastings•Sociological Science•2016

  • The Big Lie

    Open Access•James J Fahey•Journal of Experimental Political…•2022

  • News Frame Analysis

    Dror Walter, Yotam Ophir•Communication Methods and Measures•2019

  • When prophecy bends

    Donald Granberg, Edward Brent•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • Partisanship and confidence in the vote count

    Open Access•Michael W Sances, Charles Stewart•Electoral Studies•2015

  • The Dynamics of Electoral Integrity

    Open Access•Andrew M Daniller, Andrew Daniller et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • It’s Largely a Rigged System

    Open Access•Betsy Sinclair, Stephanie S Smith et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Cognitive Dissonance and Post‐Decision Attitude Change in Six Presidential Elections

    Open Access•Ryan K Beasley, Mark R Joslyn•Political Psychology•2001

  • Donald Trump and the Lie

    Open Access•Kevin Arceneaux, Rory Truex•Perspectives on Politics•2023

  • Accepting the Election Outcome

    Open Access•Richard Nadeau, André Blais•British Journal of Political…•1993

  • Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation

    T R Tyler•Annual Review of Psychology•2005

  • Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-Retest Correlation

    D R Heise•American Sociological Review•1969

  • The Dimensions, Origins, and Consequences of Belief in Donald Trump's Big Lie

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•Political Science Quarterly•2023

Citations per year6
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae