The Long Shadow of the Big Lie
How Beliefs about the Legitimacy of the 2020 Election Spill Over onto Future Elections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6368658 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew Levendusky (0000-0003-3295-1276, University of Pennsylvania), Sheila Patterson (0000-0002-2377-5509, Research Analyst, Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA), Michele F Margolis (0000-0003-2466-9553), Michele Margolis (University of Pennsylvania), Yotam Ophir (0000-0001-5049-7906, University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Dror Walter (0000-0001-9870-998X, Georgia State University), Kathleen Hall Jamieson (0000-0002-4167-3688, Elizabeth Ware Packard Professor in the Annenberg School for Communication, and Director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 933-961 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/poq/nfae047 |
| OpenAlex | W4403951699 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 16 |
Has the “big lie”—the false claim that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump—shaped citizens’ views of the legitimacy of other US elections? We argue that it has. Those who believe Trump’s claim, whom we call election skeptics, lack confidence in elections for two interrelated reasons. First, because they think 2020 was inaccurately and unfairly conducted, they think that other elections will suffer a similar fate, and hence think these elections are illegitimate even before any votes are cast. Second, while most voters think elections are less legitimate when their preferred candidate loses, this effect will be especially large for election skeptics, because voter fraud gives them a mechanism to explain their candidate’s loss. Using an original panel dataset spanning the 2020 and 2022 elections, we show strong support for these hypotheses. This has important implications for our elections, and their legitimacy, moving forward
Legitimacy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Shadow (psychology · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Law · Public Administration · Social Psychology
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Democracy and the Market
Losers' Consent
Reliability of the Core Items in the General Social Survey
The Big Lie
News Frame Analysis
When prophecy bends
Partisanship and confidence in the vote count
The Dynamics of Electoral Integrity
It’s Largely a Rigged System
Cognitive Dissonance and Post‐Decision Attitude Change in Six Presidential Elections
Donald Trump and the Lie
Accepting the Election Outcome
Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation
Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-Retest Correlation
The Dimensions, Origins, and Consequences of Belief in Donald Trump's Big Lie
| Citations per year | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |