Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Survey Research and Southern Politics

The Implications of Data Management

Bibliographic Data

ID6370519
AuthorsCharles D Hadley
Year1981
Volume45
Issue3
Pages393
Publication date1981-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/268673
OpenAlexW2121237626
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited7

With an identical data base—the SRCICPS election studies conducted over the 1952–1976 period—scholars arrive at conflicting conclusions about the future politics of the South. One problem is alternative regional definitions—the survey category Solid South (which includes the states of the former Confederacy minus Tennessee) or the combined categories Solid South and Border South. Another problem is the choice to analyze native whites, whites, or all election participants. Based on data presented here, these choices are not neutral; rather, they influence the research findings. If the intent is to build upon the aggregate data-based research of Key and others, one should use the Solid South definition. Moreover, if the intent is to predict about the future politics of the South, one should analyze all election participants

Aggregate (composite · Computer security · Key (lock · Period (music · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Statistics · Survey data collection · Survey research · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • The Heterogeneity of Southern White Distinctiveness

    Open Access•Steven White•American Politics Research•2014

  • What's the Matter with Arkansas? Symbolic Racism and 2008 Presidential Candidate Support

    Open Access•Pearl K Ford, Angie Maxwell et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2010

  • Polls and Elections

    Open Access•D Sunshine Hillygus, Todd Shields•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • The Myth of the “Two Souths?” Racial Resentment and White Party Identification in the Deep South and Rim South

    Open Access•Jonathan Knuckey•Social Science Quarterly•2017

  • Love ‘Em or Hate ‘Em? Changing Racial and Regional Differences in Opinions Toward Southerners, 1964–2008

    Open Access•Christopher A Cooper, H Gibbs Knotts•Social Science Quarterly•2012

  • Southern Partisan Changes

    Harold W Stanley•The Journal of Politics•1988

  • Blacks in Southern Politics

    Charles D Hadley•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • Class, Race Issues, and Declining White Support for the Democratic Party in the South

    Open Access•Mark D Brewer, Jeffrey M Stonecash•Political Behavior•2001

  • Where Is “the South”? Assessing the Meaning of Geography in Politics

    Open Access•Melanie J Springer•American Politics Research•2019

  • Elections and the political order

    Angus Campbell•Elections and the political order•1966

  • The human meaning of social change.

    Angus Campbell•The human meaning of social change.•1972

  • Change in Electoral Participation in the South

    Carol A Cassel•The Journal of Politics•1979

  • Secular Realignment and the Party System

    O Key, V O Key et al.•The Journal of Politics•1959

  • Patterns of Change in the Partisan Loyalties of Native Southerners

    Bruce A Campbell•The Journal of Politics•1977

  • Where the Ducks Are

    E M Schreiber•Public Opinion Quarterly•1971

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,24
Citation span1988 - 2019 (32)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae