Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sleeping Giant or Herd of Cats? An Experimental Investigation of Nonreligious Americans’ Responsiveness to Issue- and Group-Based Political Cues

Bibliographic Data

ID6373397
AuthorsIan G Anson (0000-0002-1545-4270, Department of Political Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Associate Professor, , Baltimore, MD), Carolyn Forestiere (Department of Political Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Professor, , Baltimore, MD)
Year2025
Volume89
Issue3
Pages875-888
Publication date2025-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfaf037
OpenAlexW7102671158
LanguageEN
References cited32

The rise of the “religious nones” has garnered significant interest among journalists and scholars. Whereas very few people reported that they were not affiliated with an established religious tradition just 20 years ago, currently as many as 30 percent of Americans claim no religion when asked their religious preference on public opinion surveys. This seismic shift in the religious composition of the country precipitates important questions about the attitudes, group identity, and political participation of religious nones in response to contemporary issues. In this paper, we present the results of a novel survey experiment (N = 1,013) designed to determine if issue and identity cues increase religious nones’ sense of group identification, group consciousness, linked fate, and willingness to engage in political behavior. We leverage a unique large-scale sample of nonreligious Americans to facilitate these tests. Our results suggest that relevant political messaging does little to activate collective identification or political engagement among the nonreligious. Our findings have important implications for the future of American politics, even as the number of religiously unaffiliated people continues to grow

Group identification · Herd · Identity (music · Leverage (statistics · Politics · Preference · Public opinion · Survey data collection

  • None of the Above

    Joel Thiessen, Wilkins-Laflamme et al.•None of the Above•2020

  • Nonverts

    Bullivant, Stephen Bullivant•Nonverts•2022

  • The Nonreligious

    Phil Zuckerman, Luke W Galen et al.•The Nonreligious•2016

  • Secular Surge

    Open Access•David E Campbell, Geoffrey C Layman et al.•Secular Surge•2020

  • Race, Gender, and Linked Fate

    Open Access•E M Simien•Journal of Black Studies•2005

  • Americans' Belief in Linked Fate

    Open Access•Claudine Gay, Jennifer Hochschild et al.•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2016

  • White identity politics

    Justin Berry, DAVID B EBNER et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2019

  • Bounded by Disbelief

    Katja M Guenther•Journal of Contemporary Religion•2014

  • Divided We Stand

    Steven Kettell•Journal of Contemporary Religion•2014

  • The evolution of atheism

    Open Access•Stephen Ledrew•History of the Human Sciences•2012

  • Concealable Stigmatized Identities and Psychological Well‐Being

    Open Access•Diane M Quinn, Valerie A Earnshaw•Social and Personality Psychology…•2013

  • More than meets the ITT

    Open Access•John V Kane•Journal of Experimental Political…•2024

  • "Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes

    Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • Taking a Closer Look at Group Identity

    Open Access•G R Sanchez, Edward D Vargas•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • Shared Identities

    Open Access•Christina Bejarano, Christina E Bejarano et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • The Legitimacy of Representation

    Open Access•Sveinung Arnesen, Yvette Peters•Comparative Political Studies•2018

  • Group Membership, Group Identity, and Group Consciousness

    Paula D Mcclain, Jessica D Johnson Carew et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2009

  • No Harm in Checking

    Open Access•John V Kane, Jason Barabas•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • Authoritarianism and Public Opinion on Church and State in the United States

    Open Access•Jeremiah J Castle•Politics and Religion•2017

  • Secularism, Religion, and Political Choice in the United States

    Open Access•T Randolph Beard, Robert B Ekelund et al.•Politics and Religion•2013

  • The Politics of New Atheism

    Open Access•Marcus Schulzke•Politics and Religion•2013

  • Non-Religious Identity Salience for Candidate Choice

    Open Access•Spencer Kiesel•American Politics Research•2024

  • Stratum Identification and Consciousness

    Patricia Gurin, Arthur H Miller et al.•Social Psychology Quarterly•1980

  • Traditional, Modern, and Post-Secular Perspectives on Science and Religion in the United States

    Open Access•Timothy L O’brien, Noy et al.•American Sociological Review•2015

  • Secular or nonreligious? Investigating and interpreting generic 'not religious' categories and populations

    Lois Lee•Religion•2014

  • Beyond SES

    Open Access•Henry E Brady, Sidney Verba et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Those Who Stay Religious 'Nones' and Those Who Don't

    C Kirk Hadaway, Wade Clark Roof•Journal for the Scientific Study…•1979

  • The Religious 'Nones

    Glenn M Vernon•Journal for the Scientific Study…•1968

  • The Politics of Religious Nones

    Open Access•P Schwadel•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2020

  • Creating a Godless Community

    Open Access•Jesse M Smith•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2013

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae