Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Catch Questions Can Increase Lookups on Political Knowledge Questions

Bibliographic Data

ID6373929
AuthorsMatthew H Graham (0000-0003-4808-2984, Temple University)
Year2025
Volume89
Issue2
Pages415-423
Publication date2025-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfaf015
OpenAlexW4410794470
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

Surveys commonly use “catch” or “trap” questions to identify subjects who are likely to look up the answers to knowledge questions. This note shows that catch questions can backfire, causing an increase in the proportion of respondents who look up the answers to subsequent questions. In two preregistered survey experiments in online convenience samples, a catch question was randomly assigned to appear before or after a knowledge battery. When the catch question appeared first, window switching on the knowledge questions was about 25 percent more common. This suggests that when they are used, catch questions should be placed at the end of knowledge batteries, and should also not precede later items that could be affected by lookups. More generally, the results highlight the importance of pre-testing catch and trap questions for unintended consequences

Political science · Politics · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences · Law

  • Partisan Expressive Responding

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham•American Political Science Review•2026

  • Is There a Cost to Convenience? An Experimental Comparison of Data Quality in Laboratory and Online Studies

    Open Access•Clifford, Jennifer Jerit•Journal of Experimental Political…•2014

  • Effect of Test-Taking Venue and Response Format on Political Knowledge Tests

    H C Shulman, Franklin J Boster•Communication Methods and Measures•2014

  • Looking for Answers

    Matthew Motta, Matthew P Motta et al.•International Journal of Public…•2016

  • Cheating on Political Knowledge Questions in Online Surveys

    Clifford, Scott Clifford et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences

    Norbert Schwarz, Fritz Strack et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1991

  • Does it Matter if Respondents Look up Answers to Political Knowledge Questions

    Open Access•Hillary Style, Hillary K Style et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • How to Detect and Influence Looking Up Answers to Political Knowledge Questions in Web Surveys

    Open Access•Tobias Gummer, Tanja Kunz et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2023

  • Looking up Answers to Political Knowledge Questions in Web Surveys

    Open Access•Jan Karem Höhne, Carina Cornesse et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Decision-Making in Conjoint Experiments

    Open Access•Libby Jenke, Kirk Bansak et al.•Political Analysis•2021

  • Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Michele F Margolis et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Detecting and Deterring Information Search in Online Surveys

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham•American Journal of Political…•2024

  • Relying on External Information Sources When Answering Knowledge Questions in Web Surveys

    Open Access•Tobias Gummer, Tanja Kunz•Sociological Methods & Research•2022

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae