Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fighting Covid-19 in the United States with Federalism and Other Constitutional and Statutory Authority

Bibliographic Data

ID6375481
AuthorsBeverly A Cigler (0000-0003-2599-0840, Penn State Harrisburg, USA)
Year2021
Volume51
Issue4
Pages673-692
Publication date2021-09-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublius The Journal of Federalism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0048-5950 • E-ISSN: 1747-7107
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/publius/pjab021
OpenAlexW3191684230
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited9

The COVID-19 pandemic challenges a workable American federalism. The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reserves plenary responsibilities to states for promoting health and well-being; but states and their local governments suffer from a significant lack of resources and interjurisdictional competition during major emergencies. In this article, I argue that a president has significant constitutional and statutory authority for pandemic preparedness and, by law, is responsible for leading a coordinated national response necessary to a pandemic. The article outlines the constitutional and statutory authorities available to President Trump and assesses how he used those powers to address the pandemic. It is argued that early, decisive national coordinative systems for containing and mitigating the virus; testing, tracing, contacting, and isolation protocols; data collection standardization; procurement and distribution of supplies; and planning vaccine eligibility and distribution could have reduced the state and local government disadvantages early in the pandemic, saving lives and boosting the economy

Constitution · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Decentralization · Democracy · Democratic legitimacy · Federalism · Infectious disease (medical specialty · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Preparedness · Separation of powers · Sovereignty · Statutory law · Unitary state · Medicine · Public Health Policies and Education · Law · Public Administration

  • A cross-sectional analysis of county-level determinants of pandemic-era policy implementation

    Open Access•Natasha Williams, Natasha J Williams et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Ideology, political polarisation and agility of policy responses

    Open Access•Óscar Gasulla, Germà Bel et al.•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2022

  • Public Health, Internal Borders, and the Ends of Federalism

    Open Access•Michael Da Silva•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2023

  • Integration through Expansive Unification

    Open Access•Maurizio Ferrera, Anna Kyriazi et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2024

  • American Federalism and Health Policy Spillovers

    Open Access•Robert J Mcgrath•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2025

  • The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Solomon Hsiang, Daniel Allen et al.•Nature•2020

  • The Law Pandemics and Presidential Power

    Open Access•Andrew Rudalevige, Victoria E Yu•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Public Health’s Falling Share of US Health Spending

    David U Himmelstein, Steffie Woolhandler•American Journal of Public Health•2016

  • The State of American Federalism 2019–2020

    Open Access•Greg Goelzhauser, David M Konisky•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2020

  • States Divided

    Open Access•Donald F Kettl•Public Administration Review•2020

  • The “Big Questions” of Katrina and the 2005 Great Flood of New Orleans

    Open Access•Beverly A Cigler•Public Administration Review•2007

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae