State Policy Innovation and the Federalism Implications of Direct Democracy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6375595 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kathleen Ferraiolo (0000-0002-3582-9922, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 488-514 |
| Publication date | 2007-08-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Publius The Journal of Federalism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0048-5950 • E-ISSN: 1747-7107 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/publius/pjm039 |
| OpenAlex | W2049613008 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 29 |
As state policy activism has flourished in recent years, increasingly that activism has taken place through the direct democracy process. While winning ballot measures often have implications for federal–state relations, federalism issues have largely been ignored in the direct democracy literature. I address this oversight by investigating how the outcomes of direct democracy politics affect the relationships among citizens, states, and the federal government. My analysis focuses on measures proposed over the last decade that represent either a response to perceived federal inaction or a challenge to federal policy. The findings suggest that initiatives have different effects on federal–state relations depending on the form they take. When ballot measures seeking to fill a policy void lead to federal action, they promote intergovernmental policy consensus and narrow the distance between public opinion and federal policy; if the federal government fails to address the issue at stake, additional state innovation will result and voter preferences and federal policy outcomes will move farther apart. Meanwhile, initiatives that challenge federal law create conflict and polarization between states and the federal government and widen the distance between public opinion and federal policy. The passage of initiatives in both categories heightens opinion-policy congruence at the state level as officials are often eager to publicly support and implement the results of successful ballot measures
Ballot · Democracy · Direct democracy · Federalism · Government (linguistics · Policy advocacy · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Public policy · State (computer science · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Policy and Administration Research · Law · Public Administration
Shirking the Initiative? The Effects of Statewide Ballot Measures on Congressional Roll Call Behavior
Observations of the role of science in the United States medical cannabis state policies
The Consequences of Direct Democracy for the Balance of Power between State and Local Governments in the United States
Reply to Reviewers
The State of American Federalism 2008-2009
Policy and Political Learning
Advocating for Medicaid Expansion in Republican States
Defiant Innovation
State Policy and National Representation
Public Opinion on U.S. Federal and Intergovernmental Issues in 2006
Preserving the Initiative
Lien On Me
Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives
Bottom‐Up Federalism
Minorities and Direct Legislation
Preferences, Fiscal Policies, and the Initiative Process
Gun Behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion
Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy
Institutions and Policy Representation in the States
Making the National Local
Representation and Direct Democracy in the United States
The State of American Federalism, 2005
Ballot Initiatives and Intergovernmental Relations in the United States
State-Federal Diffusion and Policy Learning
Federalism, the Bush Administration, and the Transformation of American Conservatism
The Middle Tier in American Federalism
Devolution and Innovation
Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion
Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change
The Temporal Diffusion of Morality Policy
The Initiative to Party
Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote
States as Policy Laboratories
Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation
Minority Voices and Citizen Attitudes about Government Responsiveness in the American States
Innovation in the States
Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias
State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,53 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2025 (17) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |