Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

DoesCalifornia needDelaware? ExplainingIndonesian,Chinese, andUnitedStates support for legality compliance of internationally traded products

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6377498
AutoresBenjamin Cashore (0000-0003-3492-858X), Michael W Stone
Año2014
Volumen8
Número1
Páginas49-73
Fecha de publicación2014-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaRegulation & Governance (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1748-5983 • E-ISSN: 1748-5991
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/rego.12053
OpenAlexW2115327061
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas45
Referencias citadas51

The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the emergence and institutionalization of a unique form of transnational business governance (TBG): legality verification (LV) systems, which track products along global supply chains. Instead of imposing wide ranging global standards commonly applied through “gold standard” certification systems,LVhelps domestic governments enforce their own laws. Three processes help explain whyIndonesia (as a producer),China (as a manufacturer) and theUnitedStates (as a consumer) moved, in the 2000s, from lukewarm interest or opposition to formalized support: how triggers enabled by economic interdependence are pulled; how ceding of instrument/process state sovereignty may reinforce substantive sovereignty; and historical institutional processes that shift organizational interests and problem definitions. Looking backward, the empirical results are consistent with a “Delaware effect” in which economic globalization is asserted to lead to a “ratcheting down” of environmental and social standards. Looking forward, we theorize about, and identify the conditions through which, widespread coalitions in support of theinstitutionofLV, may pave the way for a “ratcheting up” process that is consistent with, but nuances,Vogel's “California effect

Business · Business administration · Economics · Globalization · Institutionalisation · Political science · Politics · Principle of legality · Sovereignty · Corporate Law and Human Rights · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • When green trade backfires

    Open Access•Silvana Jud, Stefano Jud et al.•The Review of International…•2026

  • Sustainability certification and legality verification in Indonesian natural forest-based wood products value chains

    Depi Susilawati, Peter Kanowski et al.•The International Forestry Review•2021

  • Examining the EU Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) action plan in Ghana through a governmentality lens

    Open Access•Christian Pilegaard Hansen•Journal of Political Ecology•2022

  • Can finance and market driven (FMD) interventions make “weak states” stronger? Lessons from the good governance norm complex in Cambodia

    Open Access•Benjamin Cashore, Iben Nathan•Ecological Economics•2020

  • Turning rules into practices

    Open Access•Maja Tampe•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Mandatory due diligence for ‘conflict minerals’ and illegally logged timber

    Open Access•Lena Partzsch, Martijn C Vlaskamp•The Extractive Industries and…•2016

  • Forest certification

    Open Access•Hamish Van Der Ven, Benjamin Cashore•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2018

  • Who opposes labor regulation? Explaining variation in employers’ opinions

    Open Access•Matthew Amengual, Salo Coslovsky et al.•Regulation & Governance•2017

  • Forest management in Türkiye

    Open Access•Hüseyin Çalişkan, Üstüner Birben et al.•International Environmental…•2024

  • Governing Global Supply Chain Sustainability through the Ethical Audit Regime

    Open Access•G Lebaron, Jane Lister et al.•Globalizations•2017

  • Improving Indonesia’s timber legality and sustainability verification system

    Open Access•Depi Susilawati, Peter Kanowski et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • Designing stakeholder learning dialogues for effective global governance

    Open Access•Benjamin Cashore, Steven Bernstein et al.•Policy and Society•2019

  • Policy design for biodiversity

    Open Access•Benjamin Cashore, Ishani Mukherjee et al.•Policy and Society•2024

  • The emergence of the European Union Timber Regulation

    Open Access•Metodi Sotirov, Maike Stelter et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • Facing the complexities of the global timber trade regime

    Open Access•Iben Nathan, Jie Chen et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • A political economy of the European Union's timber regulation

    Open Access•Constance L Mcdermott, Metodi Sotirov•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Can supply chain laws prevent deforestation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Indonesia

    Open Access•Lena Partzsch, Lukas Maximilian Müller et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • Timber legality verification in practice

    Open Access•Iben Nathan, Nathan Iben et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2014

  • Trade effects of transnational timber legality assurance regimes

    Open Access•Yan Zhang, Chen Chen et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • The coalitional politics of the European Union Regulation on deforestation-free products

    Open Access•Laila Berning, Metodi Sotirov•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • FSC sustainability certification as green-lane for legality verification under the Eutr? Changes and policy learning at the interplay of private governance and public policy

    Open Access•Laura Dieguez, Metodi Sotirov•Forest Policy and Economics•2021

  • Experimental’ or business as usual? Implementing the European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreement in Ghana

    Open Access•Christian Pilegaard Hansen, Rebecca L Rutt et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Towards ‘greening’ trade? The environment in the French, German and EU supply chain laws

    Open Access•Lena Partzsch, Helen Breunig•Global Environmental Change•2025

  • Protecting “First world” markets and “Third world” nature

    Open Access•Sina Leipold, Metodi Sotirov et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Effects of stakeholder input on voluntary sustainability standards

    Open Access•Hamish Van Der Ven•Global Environmental Change•2022

  • Divide and conquer—Discursive agency in the politics of illegal logging in the United States

    Open Access•Sina Leipold, Gary Winkel•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Ratcheting up private standards by exploiting coopetition

    Open Access•Kine Jespersen, Janina Grabs et al.•Ecological Economics•2024

  • Does the rise of transnational governance ‘hollow-out’ the state? Discourse analysis of the mandatory Indonesian sustainable palm oil policy

    Open Access•Annisa Joviani Astari, Jon C Lovett•World Development•2019

  • Toward “hardened” accountability? Analyzing the European Union's hybrid transnational governance in timber and biofuel supply chains

    Open Access•Christine Moser, Sina Leipold•Regulation & Governance•2019

  • Hardening corporate accountability in commodity supply chains under the European Union Deforestation Regulation

    Open Access•Laila Berning, Metodi Sotirov•Regulation & Governance•2023

  • External Europeanization through timber trade agreements

    Open Access•Sophia Carodenuto, Fafali R Ziga-Abortta et al.•Political Geography•2024

  • Grounding transnational business governance

    Open Access•José Carlos Marques, Burkard Eberlein•Regulation & Governance•2020

  • Dynamic governance interactions

    Open Access•Lars H Gulbrandsen•Regulation & Governance•2012

  • The domestic politics of corporate accountability legislation

    G Lebaron, Andreas Rühmkorf•Socio-Economic Review•2019

  • Achieving sustainability transformations for multi-species justice

    Open Access•Stacy Banwell, Valerie Nelson et al.•Sustainability Science•2025

  • Regime complexity and managing financial data streams

    Open Access•Lucia Quaglia, Aneta Spendzharova•Regulation & Governance•2022

  • Correlates of rigorous and credible transnational governance

    Open Access•Hamish Van Der Ven•Regulation & Governance•2015

  • Private authority and public policy interactions in global context

    Open Access•Benjamin Cashore, Jette Steen Knudsen et al.•Regulation & Governance•2021

  • Experimentalist interactions

    Open Access•Jonathan Zeitlin, Christine Overdevest•Regulation & Governance•2021

  • Crises as driver of policy accumulation

    Open Access•Christoph Knill, Yves Steinebach•Regulation & Governance•2022

  • Transnational governance and the re‐centered state

    Open Access•Tim Bartley•Regulation & Governance•2014

  • Private regulation, public policy, and the perils of adverse ontological selection

    Open Access•Janina Grabs, Graeme Auld et al.•Regulation & Governance•2021

  • Transnational business governance interactions

    Open Access•Burkard Eberlein, Kenneth W Abbott et al.•Regulation & Governance•2014

  • Unbundling the Regime Complex

    Open Access•Jessica F Green, Jessica Green et al.•Transnational Environmental Law•2017

  • Biofuel sustainability and the formation of transnational hybrid governance

    Stefano Pontes, Carsten Daugbjerg•Environmental Politics•2015

  • State Sovereignty as Social Construct

    Open Access•Thomas J Biersteker, Cynthia Weber•State Sovereignty as Social…•1996

  • Smart Regulation

    Neil Gunningham, Peter Grabosky et al.•Smart regulation•1998

  • Governing the economy

    Peter A Hall•Governing the economy•1986

  • Policy change and learning

    Hank C Jenkins-Smith, Paul A Sabatier•Policy change and learning•1993

  • Trading Up

    David Vogel•Trading Up•2009

  • All Politics Is Global

    Open Access•Daniel W Drezner, Daniel Drezner•All Politics Is Global•2008

  • The Retreat of the State

    Open Access•Susan Strange•Retreat of the State•1996

  • The Divided Welfare State

    Open Access•Jacob S Hacker•Divided Welfare State•2002

  • The Fourth Circle

    John F Mccarthy, John Mccarthy•The Fourth Circle•2006

  • Sovereignty

    Stephen D Krasner•Sovereignty•1999

  • Mobilizing for Human Rights

    Open Access•Beth A Simmons•Mobilizing for Human Rights•2009

  • China's ecological rehabilitation

    Open Access•Jintao Xu, Runsheng Yin et al.•Ecological Economics•2006

  • The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures

    Felix Biermann, Philipp Pattberg et al.•Global Environmental Politics•2009

  • Revising Theories of Nonstate Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance

    Benjamin Cashore, Elizabeth S Egan et al.•Global Environmental Politics•2007

  • Globalization and Policy Convergence

    Open Access•Daniel Drezner•International Studies Review•2001

  • Can legality verification rescue global forest governance

    Open Access•Benjamin Cashore, Michael W Stone•Forest Policy and Economics•2012

  • Effects of China's WTO accession on global forest product trade

    Open Access•Jianbang Gan•Forest Policy and Economics•2003

  • Who will Meet China’s Import Demand for Forest Products

    Open Access•Jian Zhang, Jianbang Gan•World Development•2007

  • From New Order to Regional Autonomy

    Open Access•Anne Casson, Krystof Obidzinski•World Development•2002

  • Credibility of institutions

    Open Access•Peter Ho•Land Use Policy•2006

  • Compromising Westphalia

    Stephen D Krasner•International Security•1995

  • Regionalism in Post‐ Suharto Indonesia

    Howard M Federspiel•Contemporary Southeast Asia•2005

  • Managing the “hollow state”

    Open Access•Michael Howlett•Canadian Public Administration•2000

  • Realist Ontology for Futures Studies

    Heikki Patomäki•Journal of Critical Realism•2006

  • Transnational governance and the re‐centered state

    Open Access•Tim Bartley•Regulation & Governance•2014

  • Transnational business governance interactions

    Open Access•Burkard Eberlein, Kenneth W Abbott et al.•Regulation & Governance•2014

  • Why I Am an Historical Institutionalist

    T Skocpol•Polity•1995

  • The Regime Complex for Climate Change

    Open Access•Robert O Keohane, David G Victor•Perspectives on Politics•2011

  • Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance

    Open Access•Benjamin Cashore•Governance•2002

  • Globalization, Four Paths of Internationalization and Domestic Policy Change

    Open Access•Steven Bernstein, Benjamin Cashore•Canadian Journal of Political…•2000

  • The Causal Mechanisms of Interaction between International Institutions

    Open Access•Thomas Gehring, Sebastian Oberthür•European Journal of International…•2009

  • God Gave Physics the Easy Problems

    Open Access•Steven Bernstein, Richard Ned Lebow et al.•European Journal of International…•2000

  • Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework

    Open Access•Steven Bernstein, Benjamin Cashore•Regulation & Governance•2007

  • Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State

    Peter A Hall•Comparative Politics•1993

  • II. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research

    Open Access•Arend Lijphart•Comparative Political Studies•1975

  • The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources

    Kal Raustiala, David G Victor•International Organization•2004

  • Complex global governance and domestic policies

    Open Access•Steven Bernstein, Benjamin Cashore•International Affairs•2012

  • Path dependence in historical sociology

    Open Access•James Mahoney•Theory and Society•2000

Obras citantes distintas45
Citas por año3,21
Intervalo de citas2012 - 2026 (15)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 45
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae