Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The case of the camera in the kitchen

Surveillance, privacy, sanctions, and governance

Bibliographic Data

ID6377707
AuthorsEdna Ullmann‐margalit
Year2008
Volume2
Issue4
Pages425-444
Publication date2008-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRegulation & Governance (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-5983 • E-ISSN: 1748-5991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00047.x
OpenAlexW1964521829
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited14

In the summer of 2007, a member of the Rationality Center at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem took it upon himself to install a closed‐circuit TV camera in the Center’s kitchen. An email explained that the camera was installed in an effort to solve the problem of cleanness in the kitchen. The camera was removed a week later: within this week, the members of the Center exchanged close to 120 emails among themselves, expressing their opinions for and against the camera, and discussing related issues. Taking off from this exchange, this article explores some of the surprisingly rich set of normative concerns touched upon by the kitchen camera incident. Among them: public surveillance and people’s polarised attitudes to it, the invasive gaze and the argument that “if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about,” the efficacy of disciplining behavior through sanctions along with the problem of shaming sanctions, the notion of privacy and its arguable relevance to the kitchen case, and more. In an epilogue, I offer some reflections in the wake of the incident, connecting it to the incipient literature on regulation through observation. I find that it is precisely the smallness, concreteness, and seeming triviality of this incident that helps bring a large set of interconnected, vexing normative concerns into sharp relief

Argument (complex analysis · Business · Computer security · Corporate governance · Disinformation · Epistemology · Law and economics · Normative · Nothing · Political science · Sanctions · Set (abstract data type · Social media · Sociology · Computer Science · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophy · Torture, Ethics, and Law · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses · Finance

  • The Inspection House and Neglected Dynamics of Governance

    John Flint•Housing Studies•2012

  • Naming without shaming

    Open Access•Judith Van Erp•Regulation & Governance•2011

  • Shame Management through Reintegration (Cambridge Criminology)

    Eliza Ahmed, John Braithwaite et al.•Shame Management through…•2001

  • Privacy and the Limits of Law

    Ruth Gavison•The Yale Law Journal•1980

  • Concealment and Exposure

    Open Access•Thomas Nagel•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1998

  • Foucault and Panopticism Revisited

    Open Access•David Wood, David Murakami Wood•Surveillance & Society•2002

  • Shame and Necessity

    Bernard Williams•Shame and Necessity•1993

  • The meanings of shame

    Toni M Massaro•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997

  • Family Fairness

    Edna Ullmann-Margalit, Edna Ullmann‐margalit•Social research•2006

Citations per year0.13
Citation span2011 - 2012 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae