Fusion Ballots and the Question of Organisational Type
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6379266 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adam Chamberlain (0000-0002-9928-0529, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45-54 |
| Publication date | 2013-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Representation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4893 • E-ISSN: 1749-4001 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00344893.2012.751048 |
| OpenAlex | W2067665995 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 9 |
The differences between political parties and interest groups are well-defined. However, how do minor parties that rely on fusion, or the cross-nomination of candidates from other parties, view themselves? To study this, I conducted interviews with prominent party officials in three minor parties in the state of New York, where fusion politics is the norm. The evidence suggests that minor-party officials develop partisan attachments and view success as being based primarily on winning office
Law and economics · Minor (academic · Nomination · Norm (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · State (computer science · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.22 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |