The Mediation Dilemma of (Not) Talking to Terrorists

Bibliographic Data

ID6384143
AuthorsSophie Haspeslagh (0000-0002-0530-2222, American University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume26
Issue4
Pages506-526
Publication date2020-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSwiss Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1424-7755 • E-ISSN: 1662-6370
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/spsr.12418
OpenAlexW3097866008
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited42

Not long ago, it was accepted practice to ‘talk to whomever you need to talk to for peace’. Then the idea that you cannot talk to ‘terrorists’ took hold. The article explores norm contestation, what happens when hard norms interact with softer norm even when they are settled and central to mediation practice. The article traces the emergence, development and interaction of these two contradictory norms in key United Nations documents and discussions since 1945. It also triangulates this content analysis with personal interviews with UN mediators and perspectives from international non‐governmental mediators. The article argues that over the last 20 years the embedding of proscription regimes in the multilateral system has deeply re‐shaped fundamental norms underlying mediation such as impartiality, inclusivity and the idea that mediators should be able to speak to everyone to protect human lives

Dilemma · Epistemology · Impartiality · Law and economics · Mediation · Norm (philosophy · Plea · Political science · Politics · Proscription · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access