Cartels
Realism or Escapism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6397108 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Goetz A Briefs (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1946 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 68-94 |
| Publication date | 1946-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034670500040158 |
| OpenAlex | W2015310392 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
To European economists, cartels are old acquaintances. Beyond the Atlantic, they have been under discussion since Kleinwaechter, in 1883, made them the object of the first analysis. It was about the time when, in this country, monopolies and trusts were much debated. As early as Europe waxed cartel-conscious, this country became monopoly and trust-conscious. Not that American scholars were unaware of the cartels—no less than Europeans were unaware of the trusts; but it appeared to most that the sin of industry in this country was “monopolies,” whereas the enemies of cartels in Europe were equally inclined to call the cartel the sin of their economies.In the short-lived days of the NRA cartel-like organizations were entrusted with the establishment of industrial codes for market regulation. They were not called cartels, but actually they functioned, or were supposed to function, like cartels
Cartel · Competition (biology · Economics · Escapism · Incentive · International trade · Market economy · Monopoly · Price fixing · Economic Theory and Institutions · Merger and Competition Analysis
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,01 |
| Citation span | 1946 - 1946 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |