Political Republicanism and Perfectionist Republicanism

Bibliographic Data

ID6399440
AuthorsPaul Weithman (0000-0001-5677-3545, corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume66
Issue2
Pages285-312
Publication date2004-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Review of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s003467050003730x
OpenAlexW2130122092
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited22

In recent years, a number of political thinkers in philosophy, political theory and law have defended political theories which are deeply indebted to classical republicanism. Like classical republicans, these thinkers have claimed that a flourishing polity depends upon citizens' exercise of the civic virtues. Unlike classical republicans, some of these thinkers have defended what might be called “political republicanisms”—republicanisms which are also indebted to the methodological restraint of Rawls's political liberalism. The article argues that political republicanism suffers from a viability problem. Its list of civic virtues is too short. More worrisome, the public justifications that would be available to a political republican regime are not sufficient to motivate the development of the civic virtues. Therefore, if we are to be republicans, we should be “perfectionist republicans” instead

Classical liberalism · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Flourishing · Liberalism · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Polity · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub