Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Leviathan No More

The Right of Nature and the Limits of Sovereignty in Hobbes

Bibliographic Data

ID6399754
AuthorsChristopher R Hallenbrook (0000-0002-1166-4369, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume78
Issue2
Pages177-200
Publication date2016-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Review of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0034670516000012
OpenAlexW2337870832
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited9

This article challenges the prevailing interpretations of Hobbes's thought as providing only minimal protection for the natural right of individuals in political society. Natural right requires the protection of not just the subjects' lives, but their ability to live commodiously, and as a result the protection that natural right receives in political society places substantive constraints on the actions of the sovereign. When those entrusted with sovereign power overstep this constraint, they cease to be sovereign and the former subjects are returned to the state of nature to seek protection as each judges fit. I develop the substance of commodious living more thoroughly than similar analyses and demonstrate that this understanding is not limited to Leviathan but can be found in Hobbes's earlier political work as well

Constraint (computer-aided design · Geography · Law and economics · LEVIATHAN (cipher · Natural (archaeology · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · State of nature · Engineering · Law · Mathematics · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Meek’s Cutoff , Hobbes and the Ambiguities of Political Foundation

    Open Access•Christopher M Holman•Film-Philosophy•2025

  • Political Development and Political Thought

    Open Access•Philip Petrov•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • On Steven Pinker’s Hobbesian Liberalism

    Jeremy Fortier•Polity•2018

  • Can Rights Curb the Hobbesian Sovereign? The Full Right to Self-preservation, Duties of Sovereignty and the Limitations of Hohfeld

    Open Access•Eleanor Curran•Law and Philosophy•2006

  • Resisting the Scaffold

    Patricia Sheridan•Hobbes Studies•2011

  • Lost in translation. Some problems with a Hohfeldian analysis of Hobbesian rights

    Eleanor Curran•Hobbes Studies•2006

  • On Hobbesian Resistance Theory

    Open Access•Glenn Burge, Glenn Burgess•Political Studies•1994

  • Hobbes on Natural Right in Society

    Open Access•D J C Carmichael, Don Carmichael•Canadian Journal of Political…•1990

  • Hobbesian Resistance

    Peter J Steinberger•American Journal of Political…•2002

Citations per year0.38
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae