Universal Suffrage Without Democracy
Thomas Hare and John Stuart Mill
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6400623 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul B Kern (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1972 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 306-322 |
| Publication date | 1972-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034670500026097 |
| OpenAlex | W2100497822 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 3 |
As Great Britain passed into the second half of the nineteenth century, she stood on the thresholdof universal manhood suffrage. Precedent for reform had been set in 1832 but in many ways the soul-searching which culminated in the Reform Bill of 1867 was much more traumatic. Rule by a hereditary aristocracy had been weakened in 1832. Narrow suffrage based on property, nevertheless, preserved the principle of elitist rule. Because of this, Parliament was more of an “equalitarian aristocracy” than a modern democratic institution. The system seemed more rational after 1832 but Parliament still represented “property and intelligence” and the political position of the vast majority of people remained unchanged
Aristocracy (class · Democracy · Democratic system · Institution · Mill · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Property (philosophy · Suffrage · Universal suffrage · History · Law · Legal and Social Philosophy · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1983 - 2021 (39) |
| Highly cited | No |