Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Framers' Muse on Republicanism, the Supreme Court,and Pragmatic Constitutional Interpretivism

Bibliographic Data

ID6400768
AuthorsDai O’brien (0000-0002-1991-756X, corresponding author), David M O''Brien, David M O'Brien
Year1991
Volume53
Issue2
Pages251-288
Publication date1991-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Review of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0034670500014625
OpenAlexW2016430488
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited30

The so-called Madisonian dilemma has dominated recent debates over the role of the Supreme Court and suggested a “majoritarian paradigm” for constitutional interpretation. But a reexamination of James Madison's unique contributions to republican theory indicates that the “Madisonian dilemma” is in many ways misleading and unfaithful to his political vision. Madison, argues the author in Section I, worked a conceptual change in republican theory. Madison did so because he was convinced that republican liberty (and government) was primarily threatened by popular majorities and legislative majoritarianism in Congress and the states. For that reason, Madison advanced his well-known “naturalist” argument for republicanism and, on that basis, argued for buttressing the political architecture of republican government with “auxiliary precautions” for securing republican liberty. From Madison's reconstruction of republicanism, Section II moves to his conversion to the project of amending the Constitution with a declaration of rights and the basis he laid for the Supreme Court's role in defending republican government and liberty. Finally, Section III takes up Madison's view of the role of the Supreme Court and his articulation of a novel theory of pragmatic constitutional interpretivism

Argument (complex analysis · Constitution · Constitutional theory · Declaration of independence · Dilemma · Political science · Politics · Separation of powers · Sociology · Supreme court · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Philosophy

  • The Constitution and Accountability for Public Functions

    Open Access•Barbara Hinkson Craig, Robert S Gilmour•Governance•1992

  • Corruption and Virtue at the Constitutional Convention

    James D Savage•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • The Creation of the American Republic, 1776-1787

    Gordon S Wood, 朱妍兰 朱妍兰•The Creation of the American…•1993

  • The Papers of Alexander Hamilton Vol 26

    Harold C Syrett•The Papers of Alexander Hamilton…•1979

  • The Complete Anti-Federalist

    Herbert J Storing, Murray Dry•Complete Anti-Federalist•1981

  • Law's Republic

    Frank I Michelman, Frank Michelman•The Yale Law Journal•1988

  • What Is Republicanism, and Is It Worth Reviving?

    Richard Fallon, Richard H Fallon•Harvard Law Review•1989

  • Democracy and Distrust

    John Hart Ely•Democracy and Distrust•1981

  • Two Treatises of Government, by John Locke, Peter Laslett

    Open Access•Rosalie L Colie•Political Science Quarterly•1961

  • The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights

    Errol G Rohr, Michael J Perry•Journal of Law and Religion•1983

  • A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition

    Robert A Dahl•Preface to Democratic Theory•2006

  • Democracy in America

    Alexis De Tocqueville, Harvey C Mansfield et al.•Democracy in America•2000

  • Novus Ordo Seclorum

    James A Field, Jim A Field•Diplomatic History•1989

  • James Madison on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights

    Thomas A Mason, Robert Morgan et al.•Journal of the Early Republic•1989

  • The Founders' Constitution

    Paul Finkelman, Philip B Kurland et al.•Journal of the Early Republic•1987

  • James Madison, Father of the Constitution, 1787-1800

    J H Powell, Irving Brant•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1951

  • Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

    S Sidney Ulmer, James Madison•The Western Political Quarterly•1966

  • Interest Groups in American Public Law

    Cass R Sunstein•Stanford Law Review•1985

  • The Morality of Consent

    Alexander M Bickel•Stanford Law Review•1976

  • Federalism as a Metaphor in the Constitutional Politics of Public Administration

    Dai O’brien, David M O'Brien•Public Administration Review•1989

  • Original Intent and the Framers' Constitution

    Michael Kammen, Leonard W Levy•Journal of American History•1989

  • Two treatises of government

    John Locke, Ian Shapiro et al.•Two Treatises of Government•1988

  • The Supreme Court

    Dai O’brien, David M O''Brien et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•1987

  • Beyond the Republican Revival

    Cass R Sunstein•The Yale Law Journal•1988

  • The Papers of Thomas Jefferson

    Merrill D Peterson, Julian P Boyd•The William and Mary Quarterly•1962

  • The Constitution as Instrument and as Symbol

    Open Access•Edward S Corwin•American Political Science Review•1936

  • James Madison on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights

    James Farr, James R Farr et al.•The William and Mary Quarterly•1990

  • James Madison, Father of the Constitution

    Benjamin F Wright, Irving Brant•The William and Mary Quarterly•1950

  • The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions

    Adrienne Koch, Harry Ammon•The William and Mary Quarterly•1948

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,06
Citation span1992 - 1994 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae