The Fluidity of Neutrality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6401512 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Koppelman (0009-0008-3023-6205, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 633-648 |
| Publication date | 2004-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034670500039917 |
| OpenAlex | W2159007198 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 21 |
The political ideal of neutrality toward conceptions of the good is unsustainable at the extremely abstract level proposed by some liberal theorists. Neutrality is nonetheless a valuable political ideal. One of the many ways that government can go wrong is to take a position on some question that it would, all things considered, be better for it to abstain from deciding. The classic example is the question of which (if any) religion is true. The idea of neutrality holds that government ought to avoid this pathology
Governing media information through a Green New Deal
Land Use Planning for Land Degradation Neutrality
Le principe de neutralité comme justification des exemptions religieuses
The fluidity of political legitimacy
The Limits of Constructivism
Who can talk about abortion? Information, offence, freedom of speech, and the advertising ban in Germany
Language, religion and the politics of difference
Linguistic and Religious Pluralism
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.47 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2025 (17) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |