The Reluctant Postmodernism of Jürgen Habermas

Reevaluating Habermas's Debates with Foucault and Derrida

Bibliographic Data

ID6402032
AuthorsPeter J Verovšek (0000-0001-8946-2014, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume84
Issue3
Pages397-421
Publication date2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Review of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0034670522000316
OpenAlexW4280539190
LanguageDE
Citations received3
References cited14

Politicians and scholars alike have blamed postmodernism—and the identity politics that have emerged in its wake—for the pathologies of the early twenty-first century. Despite his limited defense of the Enlightenment and his disputes with his French contemporaries, I argue that Habermas's philosophy displays many postmodern characteristics that are often overlooked. These include its decentering of the autonomous subject, its skepticism towards metaphysics, and its rejection of stadial philosophies of history. In light of the fact that Habermas adopts weaker versions of many postmodern commitments, I reconsider his disputes with Foucault and Derrida regarding the legacy of the Enlightenment. I conclude that rather than interpreting Habermas as a conservative critic of his more radical counterparts in France, we should instead see these three thinkers as part of a shared attempt to come to terms with the problems of postwar Europe in a public, discursive manner

Aesthetics · Continental philosophy · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Identity (music · Metaphysics · Political science · Politics · Postmodernism · Skepticism · Sociology · Subject (documents · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism

Tools

Open DOI