Plato's Happy Philosopher and Politics

Why should Plato's philosopher rule? A deceptively simple question, and one that many would contend Plato answered in a straightforward way in the Republic: because justice requires it and the philosopher is just (520a, 520e). Yet, if justice is defined as psychic harmony (443c-444a) and psychic harmony is eudaimonia, and if pure philosophizing makes the philosopher most eudaimon (as several texts indicate) it would seem that descent from the philosophic heights to rule is unjust. Glaucon makes this objection (519d) and Aristotle, dissatisfied with Plato's reply, repeats it. The charge implicit here and in many recent commentators is that Plato provides no satisfying philosophical account of the relation between justice (dikaiosune) and happiness (eudaimonia) and thus no philosophic justification for ruling. For Glaucon and Adeimantus ask that Socrates show that justice-—by which they mean “fair-dealing to others,” the restraint from pleonexia in sociopolitical affairs—makes the just man happy of itself apart from reputation or external reward. Socrates' reply identifies justice and psychic harmony, calling the latter “real” or inner justice. But this is only a relevant reply if some necessary connection can be shown between psychic harmony and justice in the ordinary, sociopolitical sense. Is it necessarily the case that the psychically harmonious or happy man deals fairly with others? For if justice is defined as psychic harmony (well-being or happiness) then the philosopher is most happy philosophizing, and his refusal to rule is not only justified, but justified by Socrates' own argument. The potential embarrassmentthen is that the philosopher in the Republic—the only individual skilled in justification by argument or dialectic—may be incapable of fulfilling the request of Glaucon and Adeimantus. His own unwillingness to rule seems to indicate he doesn't believe in the connection between justice and happiness. Moreover, if the philosopher's dialectical inquiries into the relation between (ordinary) justice and happiness end in failure, then Socrates in fact undermines belief in justice while trying to defend it. If then, as some have claimed,4 the Republic is the true apology of Socrates and of philosophy to the polis, it is surely a disastrous one

Economic Justice · Epistemology · Eudaimonia · Form of the Good · Happiness · Harmony (color · Morality · Political science · Politics · Psychic · SOCRATES · The Republic · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

• Descent to the Cave

  Open Access•Edward Andrews, Edward Andrew•The Review of Politics•1983

  Incluir item

• The Philosophical Works of Descartes

  Elizabeth S Haldane, G R T Ross•The Philosophical Works of…•1934

  Incluir item

• Plato's earlier dialectic

  Richard Robinson•Plato's earlier dialectic•1980

  Incluir item

• Philosophical Commentary

  Han Baltussen•A Companion to Late Antique…•2018

  Incluir item

• Greek Political Theory

  Christopher Rowe, Barbara Graziosi et al.•The Oxford handbook of Hellenic…•2009

  Incluir item

• The Happy Philosopher--A Counterexample to Plato's Proof

  Simon H Aronson•Journal of the history of…•1972

  Incluir item

• The Open Society and Its Enemies

  Karl Popper•Open Society and Its Enemies•2012

  Incluir item

• Essays in Ancient and Modern Philosophy.

  H W B Joseph•The Journal of Philosophy•1936

  Incluir item

• Plato's Earlier Dialectic

  Raymond V Schoder•The Modern Schoolman•1942

  Incluir item

• Socrates and Thrasymachus

  Francis Sparshott, F E Sparshott et al.•The Monist•1966

  Incluir item

• The Presocratic Philosophers

  Jaap Mansfeld•Studies in Early Greek Philosophy•2018

  Incluir item

• The Political Philosophies of Plato and Hegel.

  Michael Foster, M B Foster•The Journal of Philosophy•1935

  Incluir item

• The Sovereignty of Good

  Iris Murdoch•The Sovereignty of Good•2023

  Incluir item

• Some Implications of a Passage in Plato's Republic

  Open Access•Michael Foster, M B Foster•Philosophy•1936

  Incluir item

• The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle, by E. Barker

  Open Access•Wm A Dunning•Political Science Quarterly•1907

  Incluir item

• Exegesis and Argument

  Fred D Miller, E N Lee et al.•The Philosophical Review•1976

  Incluir item

• Contemplation et Vie Contemplative Selon Platon

  Michael Fisch, M H Fisch et al.•The Philosophical Review•1940

  Incluir item

• The Interpretation of Plato's Republic

  Helen F North, Helen North et al.•The Philosophical Review•1954

  Incluir item

• Egoism, Love, and Political Office in Plato

  Richard Kraut•The Philosophical Review•1973

  Incluir item

• Essays in Ancient and Modern Philosophy

  George Sidney Brett, H W B Joseph•The Philosophical Review•1937

  Incluir item

• A Fallacy in Plato's Republic

  David Sachs•The Philosophical Review•1963

  Incluir item

• The Pre-Socratic Philosophers

  A Wasserstein, G S Kirk et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•1963

  Incluir item

• The Interpretation of Plato's `Republic

  R C Cross, N R Murphy•The Philosophical Quarterly•1953

  Incluir item

• Vulgar Justice and Platonic Justice

  Rudolph H Weingartner•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1964

  Incluir item

• Aristotle

  J J Chambliss, J M E Moravcsik et al.•History of Education Quarterly•1967

  Incluir item