Burma
A Neutral in China's Shadow
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6403166 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Seabury Thomson (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1957 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 330-350 |
| Publication date | 1957-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s003467050001202x |
| OpenAlex | W2096466383 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
If burma has needed to prove its right to be considered genuinely neutral in world affairs, it clearly did so in the first weeks of November 1956. At a time when it was engaged in crucial negotiations with Red China over Chinese incursions into its border territories, Burma chose to go on record in the United Nations and in the councils of the uncommitted Asian nations strongly condemning Russian aggression in Hungary along with the British, French and Israeli aggression in Egypt. Despite this, Burma to date has managed to hold its own in the Chinese negotiations
Aggression · China · Chose · Development economics · Economics · Foreign policy · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Shadow (psychology · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Law · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2012 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |