Eminent Domain
An Evaluation Based on Criteria Relating to Equity, Effectiveness, and Efficiency
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6403843 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew L Cypher (The University of Texas at Arlington), Fred A Forgey (0000-0003-2830-5781, University of Texas at Arlington and University of Auckland) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 254-268 |
| Publication date | 2003-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Affairs Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1078-0874 • E-ISSN: 1552-8332 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1078087403255371 |
| OpenAlex | W2110543855 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 6 |
As downtown redevelopment occurs, eminent domain continues to be used as an economic development tool. This research evaluates the equity, effectiveness, and efficiency of certain components of eminent domain as it is used for downtown economic development projects. A survey-based methodology was employed to acquire data from city managers located in the 239 most populous cities within the United States. The findings indicate that eminent domain is effective in raising property tax values, efficient in minimizing litigation-based project delays, but inequitable to various developers seeking title to property following condemnation
Archaeology · Business · Domain (mathematical analysis · Downtown · Economics · Eminent Domain · Equity (law · Geography · Law and economics · Political science · Property (philosophy · Property tax · Public economics · Redevelopment · Regional science · Revenue · Housing Market and Economics · Law · Mathematics · Property Rights and Legal Doctrine · Finance
Satisfaction Levels and the Community’s Attitudes Towards Urban Renewal in Alexandra, Johannesburg
Irrelevance of “Public Use” in State Eminent Domain Reforms
State-led versus market-led
Not Imminent in My Domain!” County Leaders’ Attitudes toward Eminent Domain Decisions
The Kelo Opportunity
Public Good as Public Interest
| Citations per year | 0.38 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2010 - 2024 (15) |
| Highly cited | No |