Do Land Banks Mean Progress Toward Socially Equitable Urban Development? Observations from New York State
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6404381 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Zachary Small (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA), Jennifer S Minner (0000-0002-0403-6890, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 272-303 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Affairs Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1078-0874 • E-ISSN: 1552-8332 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/10780874231169923 |
| OpenAlex | W4380741853 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 16 |
Local governments view land banks as an improvement to the municipal management of foreclosed property. Critics contend that land banks wield too much power, concentrate demolitions in poor and majority neighborhoods of color, and have unfortunate parallels to the flawed, top-down policies of mid-twentieth century urban renewal. Examining land banks through a lens of social equity and reparative planning, this research asks “To what extent do land banks in New York state work toward equitable urban development?” Interviews with land-bank leaders, property acquisition and disposition data, and spatial analysis of neighborhood dynamics were triangulated in a comparative case study of three land banks in New York state communities. Although land-bank leaders show an awareness and desire to address issues of equity, the authors observed that more community engagement, expanding partnerships with nonprofits, and shifts in approaches to demolition could provide more equitable outcomes in disinvested communities. Some land banks had clearly adopted policies aimed to acknowledge and address the role land banks can and should play in addressing historical inequities. Whether that commitment to equity will remain strong into the future remains an open question. In a COVID-19 context, land banks were operating with significantly reduced inventories and resources. More resources could be provided to land banks from Federal and State sources to support equity initiatives. But those resources should be provided under the condition that land banks become vehicles for repairing past White supremacist and structurally racist policies that created the uneven landscapes that land banks were created to address
Business · Context (archaeology · Economic growth · Economics · Equity (law · Geography · Land use · Political science · Housing Market and Economics · Law · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies · Urbanization and City Planning
Why Create a Land Bank? A Qualitative Exploration of Four Communities in Missouri
Understanding Differences Between Technocratic and Transformative Community Land Trusts
Land banking, land price and Ghana’s informal land markets
Exploring land banking, perceived neighborhood conditions, and social capital
From blight to boon
The limits to market-based strategies for addressing land abandonment in shrinking American cities
Planned abandonment
Assets‐based community development
Democracy as Problem Solving
Whiteness and Urban Planning
Justice and the Politics of Difference
Territories of Concern
From Racial to Reparative Planning
Equity Planning Revisited
The Politics of Defining and Building Equity in the Twenty-First Century
Putting the pieces together
Urban Triage, City Systems, and the Remnants of Community
Paradoxes of community-building
Demolition as urban policy in the American Rust Belt
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |